| 18:00 | <sffc> | eemeli: For the Mixed Units proposal, Ben's README has examples like
This requires unit conversion. Did you have in mind a way to implement mixed unit formatting without that? |
| 18:00 | <sffc> | Note: We already support ListFormat with type="unit", and you can glue together your own mixed unit format string if you have the individual values. |
| 18:26 | <eemeli> | One possibility, based on DurationFormat:
|
| 20:21 | <sffc> | I don't know if I want to open the can of worms of Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.format accepting a bag of fields |
| 20:21 | <sffc> | How do you feel about saying that mixed units will be shifted into the Smart Units proposal instead of their own proposal? |
| 20:54 | <eemeli> | I don't really see how they're connected, except as both advancing unit formatting? If that's enough, then maybe it makes sense to roll them up into one. |
| 21:58 | <sffc> | I mean, I'm not personally convinced that mixed unit formatting carries its own weight without the conversion half of the feature, since you can already get it manually by using a ListFormat to glue pieces together. |
| 22:13 | <eemeli> | That's fair. I'm not too invested in mixed units myself, so have no strong opinions here. |