| 00:00 | <bakkot> | some people bandwagoned that concern because of dislike for # |
| 00:01 | <bakkot> | but a fair number people also were annoyed, as a completely separate question, that they could not easily wrap a proxy around a thing with private fields and still hook its internals |
| 00:01 | <shu> | did that seem like a practical concern or a theoretical concern to you |
| 00:02 | <bakkot> | practical |
| 00:02 | <bakkot> | let me find some of the issues |
| 00:02 | <shu> | no, no, i believe your recollection |
| 00:02 | <shu> | i have no interest in re-reading those |
| 00:03 | <shu> | i just remain surprised by real uses of Proxy |
| 00:04 | <bakkot> | yeah, there's some frameworks doing some stuff with them |
| 00:04 | <bakkot> | vue, now, notably |
| 00:05 | <bakkot> | before vue3, mobX was the biggest one, I think |
| 00:06 | <shu> | vue is actually pronounced "view" right |
| 00:07 | <shu> | there was that one event at Google NYC where domenic said "voo" and i've not been able to erase that memory |
| 00:07 | <bakkot> | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| 00:07 | <bakkot> | this is not one of those words I ever use in real life |
| 01:10 | <ljharb> | shu: yes it is absolutely "view" and domenic is super trolling with that |
| 01:14 | <shu> | well credit to him it's been wormed into my brain for several years |
| 18:38 | <ljharb> | nice use of abstract closures in this proposal |