| 04:37 | <bakkot> | ljharb: https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2468/files still had todos in the source |
| 04:38 | <bakkot> | maybe should clean up |
| 04:48 | <jmdyck> | I found some other stuff too. I'll post a PR. |
| 04:49 | <ljharb> | oh, whoops |
| 04:58 | <jmdyck> | https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2621 |
| 05:06 | <bakkot> | stamped |
| 05:07 | <bakkot> | I figure this does not need review by multiple editors |
| 19:20 | <shu> | i thought the TODOs were intentional to be tackled later? |
| 19:21 | <shu> | that is, we don't have a policy to not land TODOs, right? |
| 19:36 | <bakkot> | uhhhh I think we do yes |
| 19:36 | <bakkot> | or ought to |
| 19:36 | <bakkot> | it hasn't come up |
| 19:44 | <ljharb> | i think historically TODOs are issues, not comments |
| 21:55 | <shu> | huh, okay |
| 21:55 | <shu> | i'm used to having TODOs in all codebases i've worked in |