| 17:16 | <ljharb> | i mean sure, but whenever i've tried to treat it more like one, particularly around AOs, the pushback i've gotten is "this isn't code" |
| 17:18 | <jmdyck> | I think the trend over many years has been to treat it more like code. |
| 17:18 | <ljharb> | that is a good trend |
| 17:18 | <ljharb> | altho since most people read the rendered spec before they're editing, TODO comments aren't likely to be noticed |
| 17:19 | <jmdyck> | I'm wondering what AO-related changes got pushback? |
| 17:21 | <jmdyck> | (Treating the spec like code is the whole idea behind my ecmaspeak project. |
| 17:22 | <jmdyck> | And not just the algorithms, but Early Error rules, tables, even some <p>-prose.) |
| 17:42 | <ljharb> | hm, i don't recall specifically |