| 00:41 | <shu> | in the RegExp section, is "character" the same as a code point? |
| 00:49 | <jmdyck> | No, it's sort of a union of code point and code unit. |
| 00:49 | <shu> | not sure i understand |
| 00:50 | <shu> | oh i see, depending on u mode? |
| 00:50 | <jmdyck> | yeah. |
| 00:50 | <jmdyck> | defn is in https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-pattern-semantics, 2nd para |
| 00:52 | <shu> | thanks |
| 00:53 | <jmdyck> | no problem |
| 23:37 | <shu> | ljharb: what are your thoughts on moving long-time inactive proposals to a separate category in https://github.com/tc39/proposals? |
| 23:47 | <ljharb> | what sort of category? |
| 23:47 | <ljharb> | it seems weird to categorize things outside of the process doc |
| 23:50 | <ljharb> | what i'd really like to see is inactive proposals moving to "inactive", but that requires the champions to do that, or plenary to decree it |
| 23:51 | <shu> | i was thinking "inactive" as the category, yes |
| 23:51 | <shu> | i wasn't aware that required consensus |
| 23:51 | <ljharb> | there's already an entire inactive.md file for inactive proposals |
| 23:51 | <ljharb> | it's that it's up to the champions, or consensus |
| 23:51 | <ljharb> | what'd you have in mind to be inactive? |
| 23:52 | <shu> | function.sent, for one |
| 23:53 | <shu> | maybe we should have a triage agenda item annually or something |
| 23:53 | <bakkot> | ljharb: if you have better alternative wording than "a Completion Record normally containing an X", let us know? Michael and I do not have something we like better than that |
| 23:53 | <shu> | where we dedicate 30 minutes asking champions if they still plan to pursue a particular proposal |
| 23:53 | <ljharb> | shu: i already tried to ask plenary to make function.sent inactive, and hax said he'd champion it |
| 23:53 | <ljharb> | anything else? |
| 23:54 | <shu> | fair enough |
| 23:54 | <shu> | someone should take over hashbang and ask stage 4 |
| 23:54 | <shu> | those were the two |
| 23:54 | <ljharb> | bakkot: i mean, i was thinking Foo (a, b): NormalCompletion(X) in the header |
| 23:54 | <ljharb> | shu: i'm not sure why bradley doesn't do that tbh. it's probably worth asking him directly |
| 23:54 | <shu> | bradley is no longer in TC39, is probably why |
| 23:54 | <shu> | switched jobs and the new job isn't in Ecma afaik |
| 23:54 | <ljharb> | oh, he could easily be via the node project in OpenJS |
| 23:55 | <ljharb> | but you're right, he probably won't make the time |
| 23:56 | <bakkot> | NormalCompletion(X) means it returns a normal completion |
| 23:56 | <bakkot> | which is not true |
| 23:56 | <bakkot> | it might return an abrupt completion, but if it returns normally, then the type in the completion is X |
| 23:58 | <ljharb> | ah, hm |
| 23:59 | <bakkot> | function.sent, for one |
| 23:59 | <ljharb> | he did |