| 17:45 | <Michael Ficarra> | Rob Palmer: we can discuss our plans in the editor call today, but even if there are no changes to the editor group, it may still be a good idea to have a vote of confidence and give an opportunity for committee feedback on our modus operandi |
| 19:29 | <Rob Palmer> | Thanks Michael. In the past, there has been committee feedback for us to spend less plenary time on meta issues such as elections. So unless there is a specific need for an Editor election, I would suggest not initiating one. How about raising a Reflector request-for-feedback issue for the Editors? |
| 19:59 | <shu> | i agree with the request for comments async approach. we can announce the issue in the next editor updates |
| 19:59 | <shu> | or better yet, an anonymized feedback form |
| 19:59 | <shu> | i'd rather not put folks on the spot if they have criticisms, especially in plenary |
| 20:03 | <shu> | instead they should all be given 3 incense sticks that give off distinct colored smoke that represent how pleased they are, they will be asked to form a circle with their backs turned to each other when lighting the incense of their choice |
| 20:03 | <shu> | then we will judge what color the mixed smoke cloud is |
| 21:06 | <Michael Ficarra> | Rob Palmer: I'm fine with that |
| 23:43 | <Michael Ficarra> | Rob Palmer: We'd all like to stay on for another year. Can you create an anonymous feedback submission form for us? |