| 16:20 | <Michael Ficarra> | shu: bakkot If you can, please take a look at https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2972#issuecomment-1372894434 before editor call today |
| 16:22 | <Michael Ficarra> | I think bakkot opposed using "one of" with multiple-inhabitant types, but if that's not the case, then we just need ecmarkup to support new phrasing |
| 16:34 | <shu> | thanks, adding to todos |
| 16:38 | <shu> | bakkot: do biblio files loaded later via --load-biblio always override entries loaded earlier? |
| 17:04 | <bakkot> | shu: I think so yes |
| 17:04 | <bakkot> | there might be some edge cases; it's not thoroughly tested |
| 17:04 | <bakkot> | but it should |
| 17:07 | <shu> | cool |
| 22:29 | <shu> | i also dislike "one of" with non-unary or nullary types |
| 22:30 | <shu> | if i had to form a rule around it i think i prefer something like "either an A, a X, a Y, or one of foo, "bar", or ~baz~" |
| 22:31 | <jmdyck> | so you're okay with "either" for more-than-2? |
| 22:32 | <shu> | no, it's more like i see the structure as "either {phrase about distinguishing types with >1 values} or {phrase about distinguishing constants}" |
| 22:33 | <jmdyck> | i realize that's your point, i'm just asking a side-question. |
| 22:33 | <shu> | ah |