| 16:37 | <ljharb> | https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2947 ready for a label? |
| 18:29 | <Michael Ficarra> | ljharb: yeah I don't see why it's not marked as ready |
| 18:34 | <bakkot> | stamped |
| 18:53 | <ljharb> | thanks |
| 19:13 | <ljharb> | any more to do on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2917 as well? |
| 20:11 | <bakkot> | that one just needs review from me and/or shu I think |
| 21:49 | <shu> | it's past the deadline rob set for editor group feedback, and looking at the form (which you all have access to), there were only 2 responses |
| 21:49 | <shu> | and one constructive piece of feedback which is good |
| 22:35 | <ljharb> | i don't think i have access to it, anything you can share? |
| 22:48 | <shu> | the feedback was that they'd prefer we didn't hold up PRs from contributors on consistency concerns |
| 22:49 | <shu> | and settle them afterwards |
| 22:49 | <shu> | i feel like that's reasonable for some normative stuff, especially if something is already not consistent |