| 15:32 | <Michael Ficarra> |
|
| 15:32 | <Michael Ficarra> | 🤦♂️ |
| 15:40 | <shu> | why are we even under ecma |
| 15:53 | <Michael Ficarra> | jmdyck: One thing of consequence to you is that we decided for https://github.com/tc39/proposal-import-attributes/pull/133 to allow "Deprecated" to apply not just to clauses but also individual steps. That's something you may want to take advantage of in https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2952. |
| 15:54 | <Michael Ficarra> | Btw what's the status of #2952? Is it ready for review? I'd like to review and merge if it's ready. |
| 16:12 | <bakkot> | I gotta update ecmarkup to support labelling individual steps as deprecated (etc), for both of those |
| 17:00 | <ljharb> | where was this seen? |
| 18:14 | <shu> | a humble request to not use threads |
| 18:14 | <shu> | i hate the unread notifications |
| 18:20 | <Michael Ficarra> | strange, I think my client works the opposite way |
| 18:20 | <Michael Ficarra> | I never see things that happen in threads because it doesn't notify me |
| 18:21 | <shu> | also seems like a good reason to not use threads |
| 18:22 | <Michael Ficarra> | email from Patrick |
| 18:43 | <Richard Gibson> | 🧵⃠❗ |
| 18:46 | <ljharb> | lol. i posted the issue on the 2nd and all the delegates were informed in plenary |
| 23:10 | <ljharb> | aw, threads are great |
| 23:10 | <ljharb> | the notifications for them in matrix do kinda suck tho (so much better in slack) |