| 10:50 | <ryzokuken> | okay so Istvan wrote to me saying that he's more or less aware of the status quo (that there's no PDF) and that Allen did it for us last year but also didn't quite mention if ECMA is going to do that for us, instead going for the vaguely pointy "someone should pick it up again and take action" |
| 10:50 | <ryzokuken> | I think he's proposing this be done as some sort of ecmarkup feature |
| 10:52 | <ryzokuken> | FWIW, we did produce a PDF version of the 402 spec and I could share the process with you (which is an iteration over what Leo had been doing for years) if anyone's interested |
| 13:54 | <Michael Ficarra> | IMO producing a high quality PDF is the job of a typesetter, not the editors, so I'm not really interested |
| 15:40 | <shu> | yeah |
| 15:41 | <shu> | istvan can press the print to pdf button himself |
| 16:47 | <Michael Ficarra> | we could probably side-step this issue if we convince Ecma to publish 262 as a scroll instead of a paginated book |
| 16:48 | <Michael Ficarra> | as a bonus, it would fit with our theme of a shady, powerful cult |
| 16:49 | <shu> | then it can be in Papyrus too |
| 16:49 | <Michael Ficarra> | it would only be appropriate in this exact circumstance, yes |
| 16:49 | <shu> | imagine unfurling the highest quality vellum scroll only to see Papyrus |
| 16:50 | <shu> | editor updates can be exactly like this scene: https://youtu.be/1_TuEO6Mttw?t=121 |
| 23:55 | <jmdyck> | I've added some code to ecmaspeak to complain about 'unbalanced' If-steps. Will run it on #3043 |