| 14:50 | <Michael Ficarra> | do we want to lint for places where the chain rule could be used but isn't? |
| 15:32 | <shu> | eh, i don't really like the chain rule |
| 15:33 | <shu> | if we had that machinery i'd rather insert some kind of default-collapsed box that has an explicit, auto-generated chain rule |
| 21:30 | <bakkot> | ljharb: not a big deal, but https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2613 should have been one commit, not 7 |
| 22:09 | <ljharb> | ah, did someone say that or did i miss it? |
| 22:09 | <ljharb> | they all kind of looked atomic so i didn't think to check |
| 22:12 | <bakkot> | no one said it but it's just a single edit |
| 22:12 | <bakkot> | like there's a "merge paragraphs" commit and then later a "split them back again" commit |
| 22:12 | <bakkot> | didn't need both of those |
| 22:13 | <bakkot> | default should be to land things as single commits most of the time |
| 22:23 | <Michael Ficarra> | almost all of the time |
| 22:50 | <ljharb> | fair enough |