| 01:24 | <Michael Ficarra> | I'm all caught up on my editor reviews |
| 01:24 | <Michael Ficarra> | if you think something else needs my review, let me know |
| 12:55 | <jmdyck> | Thanks for reviewing mine. There's also 2886, which is pretty straightforward. |
| 23:38 | <bakkot> | shu: regarding the kebab-case lint, are you OK with continuing to have things like ~key+value~ or 100% or whatever? |
| 23:38 | <bakkot> | or do you want specifically letters-or-numbers |
| 23:39 | <bakkot> | because I personally am fine with ~key+value~ but Michael Ficarra thinks we agreed not to do that |
| 23:40 | <shu> | bakkot: i am also fine with ~key+value~ |
| 23:41 | <shu> | my position is more accurately "lowercase, breaking up words with punctuation instead of capitalization" than kebab-case |
| 23:43 | <Michael Ficarra> | shu: what about things like emoji, uncased letters, and logographs? |
| 23:43 | <shu> | i don't know why they would come up |
| 23:43 | <bakkot> | I don't necessarily want those but I don't care to lint against them |
| 23:44 | <Michael Ficarra> | we're trying to figure out whether we consider the rule to be "no uppercase letters or space" or "lowercase letters and numbers split by some punctuator" |
| 23:44 | <Michael Ficarra> | the former would permit those things, while the latter would not |
| 23:44 | <shu> | i think the former? |
| 23:45 | <shu> | like it's a lint, if it filters out most of the cases we'd reject, there's still a human reviewing if we come up against a case we didn't think of that we don't like |
| 23:46 | <Michael Ficarra> | sure for our use case, it's not like the input is malicious |
| 23:46 | <Michael Ficarra> | but we do have to consider the 402 editors and potentially other users |
| 23:46 | <shu> | that more convincingly argues for the former, no? |