21:05
<ljharb>
(i've spoken to shu about it) at the end of the meeting i'll be asking for plenary approval of ES2024, including nicolo's normative PR and the transfer PR, so we can start the clock in time.
21:06
<shu>
what's the hard deadline to merge the PRs by?
21:08
<ljharb>
February 14th is 70 days ahead of GA which i'm told is on April 24th (which confused me because GA is usually in june)
21:08
<ljharb>
but basically, if we get them landed and i cut the spec within a week, and we get approval today, we're fine
21:09
<ljharb>
(transfer's freshly rebased if anyone wants to stamp it and slap the label on, fwiw)
21:12
<Michael Ficarra>
ljharb: also https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3222#issuecomment-1931050968
21:12
<ljharb>
ah yes thanks, i'll mention that too
23:12
<Chris de Almeida>
who was it that did a publish-on-demand print of the spec and what service did you use?
23:16
<Chris de Almeida>
vaguely recalling twas bakkot (?)
23:23
<bakkot>
nope
23:23
<bakkot>
I have used lulu.com for other things, but not of the spec
23:55
<Chris de Almeida>
I know this because literally yesterday I had a printed book show up at my door which I made with paged.js which was missing lines of text at the bottom of a couple pages and it turned out to be because those lines were present in paged.js's preview but not in the PDF generated by doing print-to-pdf from that page
ah, it wasn't the spec but this is what I was thinking of
23:58
<bakkot>
I've been using lulu for more than a decade for random projects and am generally happy with it. don't expect a heritage-quality book but it's only a little lower quality than a typical mass-market book from a bookstore
23:58
<bakkot>
and it's like $10