02:56
<ljharb>
is https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3175 ready for the merge label?
05:35
<bakkot>
should be, just stamped
17:13
<ljharb>
thanks! should https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2814 have the es2024 label, or should i cut without it?
17:20
<Michael Ficarra>
umm it would be nice to get that in
17:21
<Michael Ficarra>
only thing it's waiting for is shu to respond about the note position
17:21
<Michael Ficarra>
otherwise it LGTM
17:21
<Michael Ficarra>
I also won't die on this hill if someone prefers the note where he put it
17:21
<ljharb>
k, labeled it. https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3279 is a nice cleanup that could land right after that, if desired :-)
20:04
<shu>
Michael Ficarra: i like it after?
20:04
<shu>
bakkot can be tie-breaker
20:06
<bakkot>
I don't care, and we appear to be wildly inconsistent, and therefore cast my vote for the thing which does not require us to push up any changes i.e. leave it as is
20:07
<bakkot>
(compare e.g. the note in the first case in https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/ecmascript-language-expressions.html#sec-runtime-semantics-arrayaccumulation)
20:07
<shu>
wfm
20:58
<ljharb>
k, i'll cut the spec this evening. feel free to stamp and label https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3279 before then if desired, but obv no rush
22:41
<ljharb>
oh also, we need another PR just like https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2709 and https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3032, for ES2024. i can write one, but it's probably better if one of yall does
22:42
<shu>
oh crap always forget about the foreword
22:50
<Michael Ficarra>
maybe we just delay until next editor call then?
22:50
<Michael Ficarra>
we have time
22:51
<Michael Ficarra>
we did these in late March last 2 times
22:51
<ljharb>
true, altho we said in plenary that the spec would be cut this week
22:51
<ljharb>
it'd be really nice to get it done today or tomorrow
22:52
<bakkot>
I can write something up tonight or tomorrow
22:52
<ljharb>
since it's largely just going to be summaries of a selection of the last 6 editor slides, it shouldn't take too long
22:57
<Michael Ficarra>
yeah if Kevin wants to make a PR I can review