| 00:44 | <sideshowbarker> | Dominic Farolino: hmm yeah — but I guess for going forward at least, should go ahead and make one |
| 00:46 | <zcorpan> | There is a "browsing context" label, but maybe one for "iframe" would be useful |
| 02:01 | <Domenic> | Yeah I haven't been happy with our labels around browsing contexts / navigables / iframes for a while, but didn't feel up to re-tagging stuff... |
| 02:12 | <Dominic Farolino> | Ah browsing context is useful. Shoulda searched that.. |
| 08:10 | <Meghan Denny> | if i'm at a particular heading such as 4.10.21.8 is there anyway to see the section hierarchy of it? |
| 08:13 | <Domenic> | No (besides looking at the TOC). https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5649 + https://github.com/whatwg/whatwg.org/issues/320 envisions something that would help with this. |
| 08:16 | <annevk> | If the labels are local to the repository I think it's okay to rename them. But it might be more tricky if you want to redo them completely indeed. "topic: iframe" seems a bit too scoped as typically what goes for iframe goes for frame too, but maybe it's still a better name than "nested browsing context" or some such as everyone calls them "iframes". |
| 15:18 | <akaster> | Nested browsing context? Or should it be "navigable container"? "Child navigable"? :) |
| 15:20 | <annevk> | These are good questions and I'm gonna let Domenic, Jake Archibald, and Dominic Farolino decide. 😊 |
| 22:43 | <Noam Rosenthal> | topic: frames, iframes, navigables |