| 01:57 | <cjgoldy89> | @plug_001:matrix.org: |
| 04:33 | <sideshowbarker> | Yeah I was actually kind of hoping for that. Happy to help make it happen |
| 08:38 | <sideshowbarker> | about whether an element with a non-null tabindex value should be a “focusable area”: |
| 08:39 | <sideshowbarker> | the “If the value is a zero” and “If the value is greater than zero” cases after https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interaction.html#negative-tabindex say “The user agent must allow the element to be considered as a focusable area” |
| 08:40 | <sideshowbarker> | Why the “to be considered as” qualifier there? |
| 08:42 | <sideshowbarker> | I mean, why not instead simply “The user agent must consider the element as a focusable area” — as the wording is for the “If the value is a negative integer” case? |
| 08:42 | <sideshowbarker> | What behavioral difference does that wording difference imply? |
| 08:44 | <sideshowbarker> | Is there some circumstance in which an element is “allowed to be considered as a focusable area” but doesn’t actually end up being handled as a focusable area? |
| 08:55 | <Noam Rosenthal> | That would be ideal :) |
| 12:05 | <hsivonen> | It is my understanding that in the past 20 years, there haven't been substantial complaints about input type="week" only supporting ISO weeks. Is this understanding correct or have I missed some substantial complaint? |
| 14:39 | <cjgoldy89> |