| 07:09 | <ryzokuken> | ljharb: didn' |
| 07:09 | <ryzokuken> | ugh, sorry |
| 07:09 | <ryzokuken> | didn't dateStyle land in Chrome 85? |
| 07:09 | <ryzokuken> | in Chrome 84, the dateStyle option was being ignored |
| 07:10 | <ryzokuken> | but from Chrome 85 onwards, it is not ignored and conflicts with the rest of your options. |
| 07:11 | <ryzokuken> | I'm still not 100% sure of the version it was released in, but this is _why_ it should be failing rn, let me confirm. |
| 07:26 | <ryzokuken> | https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-datetime-style/#sec-initializedatetimeformat throws if any of the old options are used alongside dateStyle. |
| 15:53 | <ljharb> | ryzokuken: ok thanks, that makes sense; it’s still breaking this user’s site tho |
| 16:28 | <ryzokuken> | ljharb: previously, the dateStyle option was being ignored |
| 17:29 | <ljharb> | we still don't have a reflector link posted for https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2020/09.md - is this one bloomberg? |