| 20:00 | <rkirsling> | rwaldron-: I noticed you marked #2221 has `has tests` but IIRC we still need coverage for the three weird cases mentioned in https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2221#issuecomment-721367858, right? |
| 20:01 | <rkirsling> | those are namely the cases pointed out in shu's review comments which I left unresolved for visibility (though github auto-hides them since they are a few among many :-/) |
| 20:30 | <rwaldron-> | rkirsling I can write those tests tomorrow. Sorry I missed that |
| 20:30 | <rkirsling> | rwaldron-: <3 |
| 20:30 | <rkirsling> | no need for apology |
| 20:31 | <rkirsling> | it's a bit of a tangled web |
| 20:31 | <rwaldron-> | rkirsling https://github.com/tc39/test262/issues/2915 |
| 20:32 | <rkirsling> | 🙇♂️ |
| 20:34 | <ljharb> | rkirsling: rimshot |
| 20:35 | <rkirsling> | lol |
| 20:35 | <rkirsling> | I meant typed array semantics in particular, but yes, the web is tangled indeed... |