00:08
<takkaria>
Welcome, takkaria.
00:08
<takkaria>
You last visited: Today at 15:46
00:08
<takkaria>
Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 20.
01:36
<Hixie>
um
01:36
<Hixie>
this e-mail i'm replying to starts:
01:36
<Hixie>
"Sorry for the late reply"...
01:37
<Hixie>
(it's from 8 Jun 2005)
01:48
<Hixie>
> Might be. I think web developer would have a parade down Main Street
01:48
<Hixie>
> in every major city in the world if Microsoft would just fix its
01:48
<Hixie>
> standards support problems.
01:48
<Hixie>
heh
01:48
<Hixie>
(-Matthew Raymond)
02:36
<Hixie>
topic: <address>
02:36
<Hixie>
any opinions?
02:37
<othermaciej>
it is a silly element
02:38
<othermaciej>
first of all, having an element dedicated just to contact info for the document seems frivolous
02:38
<othermaciej>
second, it steals a name that would have been well suited to an element to hold an arbitrary address
02:38
<othermaciej>
third, the contact info might not even be what anyone would call an address
02:38
<othermaciej>
I don't know if that's the kind of opinions you were looking for
02:39
<Hixie>
i agree with those opinions
02:39
<Hixie>
what do you think we should do?
02:39
<Hixie>
keep it, drop it, change it...?
02:44
<othermaciej>
I don't really have a strong opinion on that
02:45
<othermaciej>
I'm sure people will complain wildly if it gets redefined to be an address instead
02:45
<Hixie>
yeah
02:45
<othermaciej>
I don't know how much content uses it, or what the practical impact would be of either dropping or redefining it
02:46
<Hixie>
http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=5 has some stats
02:46
<Hixie>
(quoted from irc from me)
02:51
<othermaciej>
my off-the-cuff opinion is that it would be better to repurpose it for addresses instead of contact info
02:51
<othermaciej>
but then again I am not the one who would have to deal with the resulting pitchfork-wielding mobs of standardistas
02:52
<Hixie>
hah
03:00
eseidel
nominates Hixie for the "most useful thing to web engine hackers" award
03:00
<eseidel>
it would only probably be your 3rd year running :)
03:02
<mpt>
An element just for addresses?
03:02
<mpt>
Would GPS coordinates count?
06:54
<Hixie>
for some reason it irks me that the html wg chairs call their phone meeting "the" html wg telecon
06:55
<Hixie>
i don't understand why
06:55
<Hixie>
i have nothing against people using any communication method to go through things they've planned to do and work out if they've done them or not
06:56
<Hixie>
it just seems to convey too much importance to that meeting
06:56
<Hixie>
maybe i should just be happy that they are diluting the term so much :-)
07:31
webben_
notes it would be useful to have a URI attribute for the cite element. anchors can't do the job, e.g. <a href="example.com">Irvine Welsh reminisces about writing <cite uri="whatever">Trainspotting</cite></a>.
07:39
<Hixie>
Irvin Welsh <a href="">reminisces</a> about writing <a href="whatever"><cite>Trainspotting</cite></a>.
07:41
<webben_>
That would be one way to do it. "reminisces" isn't especially useful link text however.
07:42
<webben_>
(either in terms of end-users or in terms of facilitating search)
07:44
<webben_>
also, that doesn't mean quite the same thing if you're pulling out bibliographic references
07:44
<webben_>
(that is, you can't be as sure whatever is meant to equal trainspotting as opposed to a resource discussing trainspotting.
07:45
<webben_>
e.g. a review
07:51
<webben_>
I suspect similar problems might lie behind http://ocoins.info/#id3205609417
08:01
<webben_>
or perhaps not: http://old.onebiglibrary.net/yale/cipolo/gcs-pcs-list/2005-June/000110.html
12:26
<hsivonen>
Hmm. for some reason bugzilla uses <td><strong> instead of <th>...
12:48
<zcorpan>
was bugzilla WYSIWYGed when it was created?
12:54
<hsivonen>
zcorpan: WYSIWYGed?
12:55
<hsivonen>
hmm. this has been fixed in Bugzilla 3.x
12:56
<hsivonen>
hmm. nope, it hasn't been fixed in every instance
12:56
<hsivonen>
oh well
12:57
<hsivonen>
there's now http://bugzilla.validator.nu/
12:57
<zcorpan>
hsivonen: crafted using a WYSIWYG program
12:58
<hsivonen>
zcorpan: I have no idea how the Bugzilla templates originated, but considering how many form fields there are, I doubt they were created with a WYSIWYG tool
12:59
<Dashiva>
What you hack in is what you get
13:00
<annevk>
it's probably back from the days when mozilla's front page was a table hack
13:00
<hsivonen>
annevk: yeah, the visible layout hasn't changed since those days
13:01
<hsivonen>
probably in between <b> has been bikeshedded to <strong> instead of <th>
13:01
<annevk>
at some point i was slightly involved in getting better markup for bugzilla, but that didn't last long
13:28
<zcorpan>
http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=9#617 http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=38&start=15#616 spam?
13:29
<Camaban>
probably
13:30
<hsivonen>
yes
13:30
<zcorpan>
removed
13:38
<annevk>
zcorpan, http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?p=621#621 (and user too)
13:39
<hsivonen>
annevk: where's the payload in that spam?
13:39
<annevk>
www button
13:45
<zcorpan>
annevk: thanks
13:46
<zcorpan>
f.w.o has a relatively high spam to real posts ratio :(
18:32
<Hixie>
annevk: dude, you keep posting to a member-secret list :-P
18:35
<zcorpan>
hsivonen: "there" is the role definitions in http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-role/#s_role_module_attributes (re http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080220#l-396 )
20:07
<Hixie>
sure are a lot of people looking for acid3 on google
20:07
<jwalden>
half of them were probably me, until the URL became memorable enough that I didn't need Google :-)
20:08
<jwalden>
comes from doing most testing in a throwaway browser instance with completely clean state
20:15
<Hixie>
jwalden: no, they're from all over the world
20:15
<jwalden>
I was being facetious
20:16
<Hixie>
=:-)
20:16
<jwalden>
(and adding words with all five vowels to the dialogue)
20:16
<jwalden>
(and doing so again!)
20:17
Philip`
gives jwalden a cauliflower
20:18
<jwalden>
whee!
20:18
<Hixie>
freaks
20:18
<Hixie>
:-P
20:19
<gsnedders>
Hixie: says the guy with a spec for his own form of English :P
20:22
<Philip`>
http://googlemapsapi.blogspot.com/2008/02/google-maps-without-scripting.html - hmm, unescaped ampersands in example code :-(
20:22
<jwalden>
don't even get me started; I'm far worse with anagramming words in conversations/etc. :-)
20:23
<Philip`>
It's fun writing emails so that every line has precisely the same length
20:23
<jwalden>
yay for not sending things with the XHTML mime type
20:23
<jwalden>
or something
20:45
<Hixie>
Philip`: yeah, i do that sometimes. dbaron started me down that road.
20:48
<Hixie>
good lord
20:48
Hixie
finds an e-mail from a year ago asking him to prioritise replying to stuff from 2 years ago
20:49
<gsnedders>
Philip`, Hixie: freaks :P
20:49
<Dashiva>
Your mailbox could be used as a modern variant of message-in-a-bottle
20:50
<Dashiva>
"Dear whoever is working on html when Hixie reaches this message..."
20:55
<jwalden>
I send an SOS to whatwg, I hope that someone will find my postMessage in a bottle...
20:59
<dbaron>
Hixie, could you suggest how to use google to search for messages with all lines the same length? :-P
20:59
<Hixie>
here's no publicly-facing ui that would let you do that
21:15
<takkaria>
Hixie: how big is your email backlog thesedays?
22:03
<Hixie>
takkaria: http://whatwg.org/issues/data.html
22:15
<Hixie>
ok so event-source
22:15
<Hixie>
we clearly want to dramatically simplify this
22:17
<Hixie>
right now each line is one of:
22:17
<Hixie>
;comment
22:17
<Hixie>
:command
22:17
<Hixie>
field: data
22:17
<Hixie>
(blank line)
22:18
<Hixie>
the current simplification results in the only 'field' being 'data' or 'message' or some such
22:19
<Hixie>
if you want to send arbitrary data, a system that makes it hard to fake would be good
22:19
<Hixie>
right now we're susceptible to people inlining strings that happen to contain newlines
22:19
<Hixie>
that would be bad
22:21
<Hixie>
we could have (length marker) (data of that length) but then we're susceptible to people using badly formed UTF-8 to make servers not realise what the length is
22:21
<Hixie>
hmmmmm
22:30
<Hixie>
hm, one useful thing would be for the event stream to include a number
22:30
<Hixie>
for each event
22:30
<Hixie>
and then reconnection requests could include a header with the last number received
22:33
<annevk>
Hixie, what member list?
22:33
<Hixie>
css
22:34
<annevk>
aah
22:34
<annevk>
it's my only sin :p
22:34
<Hixie>
:-)
22:35
<Hixie>
i hope opera doesn't mind
22:35
<Hixie>
but i'm blowing up event-source
22:35
<Hixie>
and rebuilding it
22:35
<Hixie>
to take into account everyone's feedback
22:35
<annevk>
we probably do, depending on what happens to it
22:35
<Hixie>
(i'm changing the mime type of the format, so it should be possible to support both)
22:36
<annevk>
ok, we'll see I guess :)
22:36
<Hixie>
uh
22:36
<Hixie>
wtf
22:36
<jwalden>
Content-Type: chunked comes to mind here
22:37
<Hixie>
my ipod touch just rebooted
22:37
<Hixie>
on its own
22:37
<Hixie>
freaky
22:38
<Hixie>
jwalden: you mean Content-Encoding?
22:38
<jwalden>
er, yes
22:38
<jwalden>
Hixie: re whitespace handling in the class attribute in acid3, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254337#c5
22:40
<Hixie>
man, the http spec is so badly written. it just totally doesn't have any error handling rules.
22:45
<annevk>
Hixie, it's unlikely that'll be fixed
22:45
<annevk>
for 2616bis anyway
22:45
<jwalden>
bis?
22:46
<annevk>
the HTTP WG is working on a revision of RFC 2616
22:47
<jwalden>
zounds
22:47
jwalden
searches
22:47
<Hixie>
annevk: yeah, i know
22:47
<Hixie>
jwalden: commented
22:48
<jwalden>
thanks
22:48
<annevk>
jwalden, you did not know?
22:48
<jwalden>
not at all
22:48
<jwalden>
maybe tomorrow the DOM WG will reform
22:48
<jwalden>
and the day after, hell freezes over
22:48
<annevk>
jwalden, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/ is the list
22:48
<othermaciej>
the revision is being driven by people who do not have the error handling religion
22:48
<othermaciej>
the DOM WG has basically been renamed to the Web API WG
22:48
<othermaciej>
for practical purposes anyway
22:48
<annevk>
yeah
22:49
<jwalden>
did it take over DOM core?
22:49
<jwalden>
if so, then the hell-freezing is going to be bumped up a day
22:50
<annevk>
jwalden, there's a plan for DOM5
22:51
<annevk>
or DOM4, depending on how the politics go
22:51
<annevk>
(also, not throwing WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR is likely to become legit ;-) )
22:51
<jwalden>
plans aren't quite cutting it yet for me, but I anticipate future happiness
22:52
<annevk>
we just need an editor, basically
22:53
<Hixie>
needing an editor is the main thing blocking most of the specs on this page: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Companion_specifications
22:53
<Hixie>
as well as the splitting of the html5 spec itself
22:56
<annevk>
finally, after scanning through 10 es4-discuss e-mails it got to me that RI means reference implementations
22:56
<annevk>
-s
22:56
<Hixie>
hah
22:56
<Hixie>
you should've asked here
22:56
<Hixie>
i coulda told you that
23:12
<Hixie>
othermaciej: cool
23:12
<Hixie>
(i should say that when i said "one of us", i really meant "i", but was trying to not volunteer :-) )
23:12
jgraham
wonders if anyone has told the pfwg that Fig. 1 in the ARIA spec has accessibility issues...
23:13
<Dashiva>
jgraham: Kinda like wcag2? :)
23:15
<jgraham>
Dashiva: What are the issues with the wcag2 document?
23:16
<jgraham>
(So far I noticed it uses <strong> where HTML5 would suggest <b> but that doesn't seem to important)
23:16
<Hixie>
jgraham: ironically, that's exactly why it should be b instead of strong
23:16
Hixie
ducks
23:17
<Dashiva>
jgraham: It's inaccessible to understanding :)
23:19
<jgraham>
Hixie: Actually I realized it does match the HTML 5 definition of <strong>. Which is slightly disappointing in a world-is-less-ironic-than-I-had-believed way
23:23
<Hixie>
heh