| 13:38 | <smaug____> | annevk5: ping |
| 13:38 | <smaug____> | annevk5: what kind of license is used for Opera's tests? |
| 14:10 | <benschwarz> | Hixie! |
| 17:10 | <gsnedders> | Object.create([some cross-origin window object]) should do what? Browsers seem split on this… |
| 17:10 | <gsnedders> | (i.e., "opinions?") |
| 21:29 | <annevk> | hober, basically with those editorial issues like 150 I would very much prefer someone to set a spec-wide style guide rather than micromanaging individual editors |
| 21:30 | <annevk> | micromanaging individual editors is a huge waste of time |
| 21:38 | <annevk> | smaug, depends on the tests |
| 21:39 | <annevk> | smaug, I let Mozilla use mine under whichever license they want I think per some statement in a bug |
| 21:39 | <annevk> | I think some others might be licensed under Apache 2.0 or some such |
| 21:39 | <annevk> | not really up to speed with those |
| 21:40 | <gsnedders> | annevk: For the HTML WG testsuite ones? |
| 21:40 | <annevk> | well those are licensed under whatever the W3C wants I reckon |
| 21:41 | <annevk> | I meant http://testsuites.opera.com/ |
| 21:41 | <gsnedders> | annevk: I mean what tests was smaug asking about |
| 21:41 | <gsnedders> | "Unless otherwise noted, all material on testsuites.opera.com is shared under the Apache License, Version 2.0." |
| 21:41 | <annevk> | I doubt he would be asking about HTML WG tests |
| 21:41 | <annevk> | prolly XHR or EventSource |
| 22:01 | <annevk> | smaug____, see logs |
| 22:02 | <annevk> | did anyone see any kind of conclusion in the Exceptions thread? |
| 22:02 | <annevk> | I still have no idea whether to change DOM Core |
| 22:02 | <annevk> | and how |
| 22:02 | <annevk> | Hixie, are you around btw? |
| 22:03 | <annevk> | Hixie, I was wondering whether you have some kind of list of things that are wrong with DOM Traversal |
| 22:03 | <heycam> | annevk, didn't seem to have a conclusion yet, although I think most people seem convinced the "instanceof Blah" checking is bad |
| 22:07 | <smaug____> | annevk: so it is ok to take your tests and modify them to work with mochitests ? |
| 22:08 | <annevk> | heycam, yeah that's what I got out of it too |
| 22:08 | <smaug____> | do I need to add some license text and mention copyright Opera ? |
| 22:08 | <annevk> | smaug____, yeah, though preferably that is done via the separate javascript file |
| 22:09 | <annevk> | smaug____, i mean the idea is that we use this framework for all tests |
| 22:09 | <annevk> | smaug____, no that's not needed |
| 22:11 | <smaug____> | annevk: thanks |
| 22:17 | <Hixie> | annevk: not specially. it just needs rewriting to actually be defined. |
| 22:20 | <annevk> | k |
| 22:25 | <heycam> | anyone know if a good way to feature detect svg as a css background image? |
| 22:25 | <heycam> | s/if/og/ |
| 22:25 | heycam | sighs |
| 22:28 | <annevk> | just assume it's supported? |
| 22:28 | <heycam> | :) |
| 22:28 | <heycam> | maybe I should just do that |