03:19
<crocket>
hi
03:19
<crocket>
Will there be a volume attribute for <video> an <audio> tags in case some internet boards don't allow javascript?
06:08
<annevk>
crocket, I don't think there are plans for that
08:42
<crocket>
hmm
08:42
<crocket>
Please make a plan to place a volume attribute in <audio> and <video> tags.
08:43
<Ms2ger>
Why?
08:43
<crocket>
On internet boards that don't allow javascripts, the initial volume should be set with a tag attribute.
08:44
<crocket>
Ms2ger, You know most of internet boards prohibit javascripts for security.
08:44
<Ms2ger>
Why would you need to set the volume?
08:44
<crocket>
The default volume is 100%
08:44
<crocket>
which is too loud for some audio files.
08:44
<crocket>
I need to pre-configure it to be 10~20%.
08:45
<crocket>
I don't want to surprise people with music.
08:45
<crocket>
I myself was surprised many times with 100% volume.
08:45
<crocket>
BGM
08:46
<crocket>
Ms2ger, interested
08:46
<crocket>
Ms2ger, interested?
08:46
<Ms2ger>
Not particularly, but it's not me you have to convince
10:25
<hsivonen>
I haven't incremented the version number of Validator.nu in ages. I think I should change the version number to "Living Validator@
10:25
<hsivonen>
s/@/"/
15:33
<Hixie>
hsivonen: google search doesn't show a version number
15:52
<david_carlisle>
whatwg weekly highlighted that microdata attributes don't apply to MathML. If we wanted them to apply to MathML, what would be the right course of action?
15:55
<Ms2ger>
One hint: it's not namespaces ;)
15:55
<david_carlisle>
good:-)
16:01
<david_carlisle>
Ms2ger: I don't think an author a document should be too concerned with which WG specified which element, so if microdata works in most places I'd rather it worked in mathml too
16:02
<Ms2ger>
Makes sense
16:02
<david_carlisle>
Ms2ger: but as noted in the topic of this channel, sense isn't always enough
16:06
<Ms2ger>
I'm sure Hixie can tell you how to approach it :)
16:25
<Ms2ger>
TabAtkins, should there be an obsoletion notice on css3-cascade?
16:31
<TabAtkins_>
Ms2ger: The WG decided no, since we're going to chunk the "value computation steps" from Values to Cascade.
16:38
<TabAtkins_>
(In other words, we plan to attach an editor to it.)
16:38
<Ms2ger>
And editor time? :)
16:38
<TabAtkins_>
Editors are composed of editor time. Names by themselves don't qualify as editors. ^_^
16:44
<smaug____>
Ms2ger: default value for optional boolean parameter is false, right?
16:44
<Ms2ger>
Yes
16:44
<Ms2ger>
Unless stated otherwise in prose
16:45
<smaug____>
ah, right
16:45
<smaug____>
ok
16:45
<smaug____>
I'm thinking about importNode
16:46
<smaug____>
webkit supports optional parameter (probably the generic bug to allow leaving out some parameters), but it defaults to deep=false
16:46
<Ms2ger>
Mm
16:46
<Ms2ger>
And the spec defaults to true
16:46
<smaug____>
well, spec makes more sense
16:46
<smaug____>
er
16:46
<smaug____>
I mean true means more sense in this case
16:47
<Ms2ger>
Agreed
16:48
<smaug____>
s/means/makes/
16:48
<smaug____>
ugh
16:49
Ms2ger
files a webkit bug
16:55
<Ms2ger>
Once I figure out where they put DOM bugs
20:53
<Ms2ger>
And the WG is redesigning gradients again!
20:55
<smaug____>
nice
20:55
<smaug____>
I wonder how many different syntaxes there has been
20:56
<Ms2ger>
I don't want to know
20:56
<Rik`___>
they can't even choose the room temperature :)
20:57
<smaug____>
Ms2ger: btw, I tried to change the component of your webkit bug, but could figure out any what component could be the right one
20:57
<smaug____>
s/could/couldn't/
20:57
<Ms2ger>
Same here
20:57
<smaug____>
why am I typing so badly today
21:04
<Ms2ger>
smaug____, yep, random insanity is what we spec writers are good at ;)
21:06
<smaug____>
sorry :)
21:07
<Ms2ger>
Well, it's true
21:08
<Ms2ger>
But we really should get you to write some specs yourself ;)
21:09
<smaug____>
obviously it would be full of random typing errors
21:09
<smaug____>
but otherwise 100% sane
21:10
<smaug____>
well, I could try first 10% sanity level
21:12
<Ms2ger>
:)