| 01:04 | <zewt> | this fad of blocking onpaste in "confirm email address" inputs needs to be shot into the sun |
| 01:05 | <zewt> | oh jesus this site just did the "no right click" thing, i feel like i've been shot back in time |
| 07:29 | <Domenic_> | annevk-cloud: ping https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24000 |
| 08:38 | <annevk-cloud> | Domenic_: invalid, Ms2ger is correct |
| 08:38 | <Ms2ger> | WFM, I guess |
| 08:39 | <annevk-cloud> | fair |
| 08:49 | <Ms2ger> | Offered without comment: "the currently-most-portable-and-not-controlled-by-maniacs runtime language, JavaScript" |
| 09:17 | <MikeSmith> | Ms2ger: I'm having a hard time figuring out how to get Hixie's javascript-url tests to run effectively under testharness.js |
| 09:18 | <MikeSmith> | problem is if you load http://www.hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/html/navigation/javascript-url/001.html you'll see if basically fails initially first before un-failing |
| 09:19 | <MikeSmith> | in the iframe |
| 09:19 | <MikeSmith> | you see first "Fail" and then after that "inner address used for resolution" |
| 09:20 | <Ms2ger> | Mmm |
| 09:20 | <MikeSmith> | a Flash of Fail as it were |
| 09:20 | <MikeSmith> | lemme gist my naive attempt so far at getting it to work |
| 09:21 | <MikeSmith> | basicaly I guess I need to get testharness.js to ignore the initial fail |
| 09:22 | <MikeSmith> | Ms2ger: https://gist.github.com/sideshowbarker/7855058 |
| 09:23 | <MikeSmith> | using onload="frameLoaded()" to call the test |
| 09:25 | <MikeSmith> | and it runs twice because the iframe first gets loaded from inner.html then its .location is re-assigned to test.txt and it re-loads |
| 09:25 | <MikeSmith> | at least I assume that's what happenes |
| 09:26 | <Ms2ger> | Right |
| 09:26 | <Ms2ger> | Maybe make the first one say "first load" or something like that and check for both loads? |
| 09:27 | <MikeSmith> | yeah |
| 09:27 | <MikeSmith> | I tried that but it didn't seem to work, or whatever reason |
| 09:27 | <MikeSmith> | but I'll try again |
| 09:28 | <MikeSmith> | either that or try a completely diferent approach to the test that gets the same result but in some other way |
| 10:20 | <MikeSmith> | Ms2ger: updated the gist https://gist.github.com/sideshowbarker/7855058 |
| 10:20 | <MikeSmith> | if you're still around please take a look and lemme know if that looks sane |
| 14:38 | <phuu> | hi #whatwg. looking at the Promises DOM draft – what's the most up-to-date polyfill for this spec? |
| 14:38 | <phuu> | is it the testable-implementation here: https://github.com/domenic/promises-unwrapping? |
| 19:10 | <JonathanNeal> | phuu: I made one @ https://github.com/jonathantneal/polyfill |