01:31
<zewt>
hard to take people seriously who say "HTML5.1" with a straight face
01:31
<smaug____>
that w3 bug?
01:32
<zewt>
yeah, heh
04:15
<cabanier>
Hixie: path = new Path(paths [, fillRule ] ) ?
08:39
<SteveF>
zewt: "HTML5.1" yeah idjits, it's "HTML 5.1"
10:11
<qFox>
is there any way for an element in the HEAD to be "promoted" to the BODY due to a document write inside of that (or any other) element? besides writing directly into the HEAD itself...
10:12
<qFox>
hmmm actually, I suppose writing any kind of non-HEAD tag inside it would do so. *writes more tests*
10:16
<qFox>
otoh, only script style and title actually have content. script and style will just interpret any content semantically theirs, not html. title... dunno, cant force it to become body
10:17
<qFox>
and it seems title also accepts any content, even <, as literal for the title
10:30
<Ms2ger>
Does anybody except Gecko support document.load?
10:36
<MikeSmith>
Ms2ger: I think not
10:36
<MikeSmith>
was just talking about that with darobin_ and deniak
10:37
<Ms2ger>
I thought it was claimed that IE also supported it, but I haven't managed to make it show that
10:48
<darobin_>
I'd try to confirm, but Win8 is being its usual piece of horseshit by forgetting which password it wants me to use
10:50
MikeSmith
can't be assed to fire up a VM
10:53
<darobin>
Ms2ger, MikeSmith: yeah, no XMLDocument.load in IE11
10:54
<darobin>
IE11's actually a nice browser, shame it only runs on such a horrendous excuse for an OS
11:01
<MikeSmith>
I actually like the Win8 UI
11:01
<MikeSmith>
quite a lot
11:02
<MikeSmith>
it just pretty much requires a touch screen
11:02
<MikeSmith>
and all windows laptops have touchscreens
11:02
<MikeSmith>
even the cheap ones
11:03
<MikeSmith>
I predict that some year wheneven apple gets around to shipping macbooks with touchscreens, it will be hailed as a great revolutionary innovation from apple
11:37
<Ms2ger>
Filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=983090 to remove it from Gecko
12:56
<GPHemsley>
Hmm... should &lte; really be parsed as "<e;"?
12:59
<GPHemsley>
(nevermind that that's not the correct character reference for what I'm looking for)
12:59
<jgraham>
GPHemsley: Yes
13:00
<GPHemsley>
that's unfortunate
13:00
<GPHemsley>
unexpected, from a naïve perspective
13:18
<MikeSmith>
fyi http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Recruitment/#web-dev
13:19
<MikeSmith>
W3C Japan is looking to hire a web developer with JavaScript/front-end skills to work on the W3C systems team
13:20
<MikeSmith>
at Keio SFC
13:33
<wilhelm_>
MikeSmith: Which way does the position lean the most? Towards UX/HTML/CSS or backend development?
13:37
<MikeSmith>
wilhelm_: UX/HTML/CSS
13:38
<MikeSmith>
the systems team has a lot of people with strong backend-dev skills already
13:38
<MikeSmith>
so in part hoping to balance things out a bit more
13:38
<wilhelm_>
I have a designer-who-can-code candidate in mind, based in Tokyo.
13:38
<MikeSmith>
definitely point them my way
13:39
<MikeSmith>
I'd like to find somebody sooner rather than later
13:39
<MikeSmith>
at least get interviewed soon
13:39
<wilhelm_>
I'll prod her. (c:
13:40
<MikeSmith>
cool
13:56
<karlcow>
MikeSmith: http://twitter.com/karlpro/status/444109571389288449
13:57
<MikeSmith>
ah cool
13:57
<MikeSmith>
thanks karlcow
13:58
<MikeSmith>
I'll tweet something in the morning as well
13:58
<MikeSmith>
for now -> 銭湯
15:57
<dglazkov>
good morning, Whatwg!
18:52
<Domenic_>
Looking for an example site that triggers mixed content warnings...
18:58
<miketaylr>
Domenic_: https://www.samsung.com/us/ is one
18:59
<Domenic_>
miketaylr: perfect, thanks
19:29
<gsnedders>
http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2885 — anyone able to run that in IE11 (or just look and check that the expectation is correct?)
19:31
<miketaylr>
gsnedders: i get "FAIL (creation failed; event did not fire)" in my IE11 VM
19:32
<gsnedders>
Okay, can someone tell me what's correct? I don't see anything in any spec justifying it failing.
19:32
<gsnedders>
But if it fails the event should definitely fire
19:32
<gsnedders>
(Passes Firefox, fails Chrome IE11)
19:34
<gsnedders>
Though I don't see anyway for "create a drawing buffer" to fail?
19:54
<gsnedders>
wat. the IE Feedback allows .xml file uploads, but not .html?
19:57
<[bjoern]>
XHTML renders all exploits innert.
21:36
<[bjoern]>
https://twitter.com/annevk/status/444126322390863872 -- That would make public-webcrypto the first W3C discussion list I am subscribed to but cannot post to; it seems more likely that http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcrypto/ just says so on the packaging.
21:38
<arunranga>
Hixie, would you prefer a switch from the origin of the invoking script to the origin of the resource (re: W3C Bug 24998)? It seems wrong to leave something that you think doesn't really work.
21:54
<Hixie>
arunranga: how is the origin of the resource defined?
21:55
<arunranga>
The origin of the Blob.
21:55
<arunranga>
Which could be the origin of the script which coined it, but that seems no better than the origin of the script that called URL.create*
21:56
<arunranga>
Origin-less scripts shouldn't be used to tack origin
21:59
<Hixie>
scripts don't have origins
22:00
<Hixie>
arunranga: you probably mean the effective origin specified by the incumbent script settings object
22:00
<Hixie>
arunranga: at the time of the method call
22:00
<Hixie>
arunranga: anyway, i don't care what it is, so long as it is defined :-)
22:01
<arunranga>
Hixie, you're right. I'm probably using ad-hoc terminology. I mean what you just said :)
22:01
<arunranga>
Hixie, so I'll update that. I'll scour the spec, but pointers helpful.
22:03
<Hixie>
just do a search for "the effective script origin specified by the incumbent settings object"
22:03
<Hixie>
in the html standard
22:04
<Hixie>
to see how it's done
22:04
<Hixie>
hth