| 02:04 | <Domenic_> | Hixie: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pk685ndmevf2jee/Screenshot%202014-04-25%2022.03.08.png |
| 02:08 | <zewt> | the vertical gradient is a bit unpleasant, but I don't see that when I load it |
| 02:09 | <zewt> | by the way, vertical tabs ^5 |
| 02:10 | <Hixie> | Domenic_: it's all changed now :-) |
| 02:10 | <Hixie> | (what was the problem with that screen shot?) |
| 02:11 | <Domenic_> | Ohhh, that's nicer |
| 02:11 | <Domenic_> | the overflowing text and the weird color distribution when not in a 3x3 grid |
| 02:11 | <Hixie> | meh, not sure it's that much better. i'm still not really hapy with it overall. |
| 02:11 | <Hixie> | happy |
| 02:12 | <Domenic_> | it's definitely better. |
| 02:12 | <Domenic_> | It'd be nice if the groups were always on the same line |
| 02:12 | <Hixie> | hmmm |
| 02:13 | <zewt> | if there was some way to have CSS derive colors using a formula taking the X and Y position relative to some position into account, and maybe select colors in an HSV color space, you could have the items select colors in some smart way based on how they're laid out dynamically :P |
| 02:13 | <zewt> | (was: re: no) |
| 02:14 | <zewt> | it's sort of weird how resizing the page in chrome makes chrome freeze up for 1-2 seconds |
| 02:14 | <zewt> | i'd think it'd just lay out the stuff that's visible, and do some really fast rough estimation for the rest just to guesstimate the scrollbar |
| 02:16 | <zewt> | oops, i forgot that opening the inspector on the spec is a mistake |
| 02:18 | <zewt> | fwiw, I have no idea what the "watch for updates" checkbox means |
| 02:18 | <zewt> | (not so much asking for an explanation as pointing out the page seems unobvious) |
| 02:18 | <Hixie> | it does pretty much exactly what it says |
| 02:18 | <zewt> | the text says to me "click here to sign up for emails when something changes", but that doesn't make sense with a checkbox |
| 02:18 | <Hixie> | that's the "Edit Subscriptions" button |
| 02:20 | <Hixie> | Domenic_: ok, they stick together now |
| 02:22 | <Domenic_> | Hixie: nice, I think that's a definite win. |
| 10:22 | <Ms2ger> | "Interstellar Travel, Inc. joined W3C" |
| 11:47 | <annevk> | lol Apple still uses DTDs and stuff http://www.macrumors.com/2014/04/25/touch-id-ipad-biometrickit/ |
| 12:20 | GPHemsley | wants to work on space travel specs! |
| 18:00 | <manu> | In space, the only MUST is survival. |
| 18:00 | <manu> | (bad spec jokes, or a great tag line to a standardization movie set in space) |
| 19:32 | <smaug____> | xhr spec is getting hard to follow :( |
| 20:43 | <zcorpan> | https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81752 yay productive |
| 20:49 | <jgraham> | Well maybe if WebKit starts getting left behind they will give up with the stop energy on specwise correctness changes |
| 20:50 | <jgraham> | Alternatively buy some popcorn and enjoy the show |
| 20:50 | <jgraham> | Alternatively spend a few seconds reviewing https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/1393 instead ;) |
| 20:55 | <zcorpan> | jgraham: SharedWorker should never propagate error to window per spec, but dunno if you need to care about that in this test. i think i checked for it in some other sharedworker tests |
| 20:55 | <jgraham> | zcorpan: Yeah, I guess that's a bug in Gecko |
| 20:55 | <zcorpan> | yep |
| 20:56 | <jgraham> | But having this test be stable in the face of that bug is useful, especially if we check for it elsewhere |
| 20:57 | <zcorpan> | makes sense |
| 21:06 | <jgraham> | zcorpan: Thanks |
| 21:35 | <Hixie> | jgraham: how's the spec's header? still too ugly? |
| 21:46 | <IZh> | Hixie: What about to make red image [WHATWG] on every page of developers site to be a link to whatwg.org? |
| 21:46 | <IZh> | Hi. |
| 21:46 | <Hixie> | that's benschwarz's |
| 21:48 | <IZh> | benschwarz: Hi. |
| 21:50 | <IZh> | Hixie: and what is yours? ;-) |
| 21:51 | <Hixie> | my what? |
| 21:51 | <jgraham> | Hixie: Well I don't exactly like it, but it's no worse than the rest of the spec now :) |
| 21:52 | <Hixie> | jgraham: ok, same as me then :-) |
| 21:52 | <Hixie> | jgraham: definitely open to better ideas if you have any btw :-) |
| 21:53 | <IZh> | Hixie: responsibility. I'm new here and don't know yet who makes what. :-) |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | aah |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | i do the html spec |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | http://whatwg.org/html |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | benschwarz: does the conversion to developers.whatwg.org |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | (much like you do the conversion to pdf) |
| 21:53 | <Hixie> | anne does most of the other specs, like url, xhr, dom |
| 21:54 | <Hixie> | jgraham and zcorpan and others do a lot of testing and spec review |
| 21:54 | <Hixie> | smaug and others do implementation |
| 21:55 | <IZh> | I see. :-) It would be nice to note it somewhere on the site. :-) |
| 21:57 | <IZh> | By the way, offline caching is a coolest idea. Why not all sites in the XXI century use it? :-) It's Very useful for mobile browsing. |
| 22:12 | <IZh> | The link to validators is broken. |
| 22:12 | <IZh> | validators.whatwg.org -> validator.whatwg.org? |
| 22:13 | <Hixie> | the multipage copy is out of date |
| 22:13 | <Hixie> | for some reason anne's script isn't giving me a valid return value any more |
| 22:14 | <Hixie> | (anne does the multipage conversion) |
| 22:14 | <IZh> | I see... |
| 22:20 | <IZh> | http://html5.validator.nu/?doc=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.whatwg.org%2F&submit=Check ;-) |
| 22:22 | <IZh> | The main page of the validator is not valid. |
