| 03:29 | <Rastus_Vernon> | Ooooh! I just realized the W3C cheatsheet supports CSS at-rules. |
| 03:30 | <Rastus_Vernon> | http://www.w3.org/2009/cheatsheet/#search,@media |
| 03:31 | <Rastus_Vernon> | Hum, but it doesn’t link to the specification… and my primary use for that cheatsheet is getting quickly to the specification of any HTML element, CSS property, HTML attribute, etc. |
| 05:19 | <eligrey> | if i sent a message to the mailing list with an unregistered email and then register after the fact, must i re-send the message? |
| 05:19 | <eligrey> | or will it go properly through after registration? |
| 05:19 | <SamB> | eligrey: did you get a bounce yet? |
| 05:20 | <eligrey> | yeah, just now |
| 05:20 | <SamB> | those tend to contain some kind of instructions |
| 05:22 | <eligrey> | i don't want to spam everyone |
| 05:22 | <eligrey> | can i just send to whatwg⊙lwo when i resend? |
| 05:23 | <SamB> | maybe you should give special delivery instructions to your mailer daemon ... |
| 05:23 | <eligrey> | as long as the subject is the same it'll keep its context right? |
| 05:24 | <SamB> | er, message ID is important |
| 05:24 | <eligrey> | in the archives |
| 05:24 | <SamB> | ideally resend with the same message ID |
| 05:25 | <eligrey> | SamB: i don't think i can configure that header in gmail |
| 05:26 | <SamB> | It has SMTP access; you could do magic that way. Or you could repost with an apology. |
| 22:43 | <zewt> | did someone really just say "we should do something we thought was a bad idea because the web has more competition now" |