05:15
<roc>
ok, whoever posted that w3c meme about the Westboro Baptist Church, that was low.
05:16
<SamB>
roc: is there any meme related to the Westboro Baptist Church that isn't?
05:32
tantek
catches up on w3c memes
14:08
<zewt>
does github just not test their site in firefox or is it a windows/mac thing or something, they use unicode characters all over the place that it doesn't render
14:08
<zewt>
replacement glyphs all over the place
14:09
<kbrosnan>
adblock or noscript can and often block external fonts resulting in the fallback glyphs
16:36
<zewt>
using fonts for icons? bad idea, firefox lets you disable site fonts right in the options menu (so you don't have to squint to read every unreadable font some artist thought looked cool)
16:39
<astearns>
zewt: so use ligatures for icons - if the font doesn't load, you get 'menu' instead of the icon :)
17:07
<SamB>
astearns: hah
21:37
<jgraham>
astearns: Be careful what you wish for, if people start doing that, the web might start to work much better with web fonts disabled
21:41
<odinho>
Wouldn't want that, now would we?
21:43
<SamB>
yeah, wanting the web to work better, that's crazy
21:53
<jgraham>
I imagine adobe would be annoyed if people started disabling web fonts ;)
21:54
<SamB>
and your point is?
21:55
<jgraham>
Well I guess it depends how well astearns' opinions match his employers'
22:51
<roc>
zewt: got an example of that github unicode character issue?
22:51
<roc>
I haven't seen it
23:21
<zewt>
https://zewt.org/~glenn/github.png
23:21
<zewt>
happens if "allow pages to choose their own fonts" is unchecked in firefox
23:26
<SamB>
also happens if you use noscript, no?
23:26
<zewt>
no idea
23:27
<zewt>
wouldn't make sense, but noscript doesn't make much sense anyway unless you have to deal with really abusive sites
23:28
<SamB>
eh, it's a good way to check for graceful degradation ;-P
23:28
<SamB>
/progressive enhancement