| 07:43 | <_2_Andreina> | Hola |
| 08:43 | <annevk> | Hixie: bz believes document.open() should create a new Realm and global environment record as well |
| 08:44 | <annevk> | hsivonen: https://webforms2.testsuite.org is now restored, though you might need to clear cache |
| 08:44 | <annevk> | hsivonen: apparently DreamHost uses a 301... |
| 11:31 | <jsx> | First of all, sorry for asking this here, with a spec link to w3c. But I couldn't understand why some of the predefined CSS counter styles are listed under 'Complex' prefefined styles? For example, the japanese-formal and japanese-informal styles don't seem to be using any special algorithms - http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-counter-styles/#limited-japanese. |
| 11:31 | <jsx> | Then why are they listed under 'complex' styles? |
| 11:41 | <Ms2ger> | TabAtkins, ^ |
| 20:33 | <GPHemsley> | Wait, mailman supports topic categories... why don't we use them? |
| 23:01 | <TabAtkins> | jsx: They group with the Chinese styles, which are "complex". Also, they previously were defined out to 10^16, which requires "complex" handling. That's not true any more, but wtv. |