| 06:22 | <hgl> | is it correct that in es6, it's not possible to define static properties (or prototype properties) with the class syntax? |
| 06:31 | <krijnhoetmerbot> | MikeSmith: thanks! :) |
| 06:47 | <MikeSmith> | krijnhoetmerbot: cheers man. Sorry I didn't contribute before now but going forward I plan to again in another couple few months |
| 08:48 | <zcorpan> | i wonder if http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2010/05/13/meta-refresh-causes-additional-http-requests.aspx is something other browsers also do and if it's needed for web compat |
| 09:17 | <hgl> | i wonder why es6 doesn't allow "export default var obj = {};" it's useful when the obj exposed is a data structure, and that only partially importing some properties doesn't make much sense, so you just want to do "import obj from ..." and not "import * as obj from ..." to emphasize it's a data structure. |
| 10:42 | <jami> | Can someone of you fix the wiki html5 drag n drop example |
| 10:43 | <jami> | There is a typo |
| 10:44 | <jami> | In example code (drag and drop) |
| 11:02 | <annevk> | jami: if it's in a wiki, can't you fix it? |
| 11:03 | <jami> | I don't have a account |
| 11:03 | <annevk> | jami: I can get you an account if you give me a username and password |
| 11:04 | <annevk> | jami: oops, s/password/email/ |
| 13:00 | <zcorpan> | http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2014/the-pain-of-duplicate-scripts/ should we have an attribute on <script> that skips download/execution for duplicate scripts? |
| 14:31 | <wanderview> | JakeA: slightlyoff: would it be possible for me to get permissions to add labels to issues on the SW repo? |
| 14:33 | <JakeA> | wanderview: I don't have security clearance to make that change, it's down to slightlyoff |
| 14:33 | <wanderview> | k, np |
| 15:19 | <annevk> | foolip: there's a compat problem with getElementById |
| 15:20 | annevk | tries to remember |
| 15:23 | <foolip> | annevk: a problem if it's on Element is what the spec claims |
| 15:26 | foolip | commented and leaves for the day |
| 15:29 | <rubys> | Domenic: https://url.spec.whatwg.org/interop/test-results/?select=current - still early, buggy; but should be heading in the direction you were looking for? |
| 15:57 | <Domenic> | hgl: incorrect |
| 16:05 | <annevk> | rubys: how problematic is it for me to continue patching the current parser? |
| 16:06 | <annevk> | I'd like to fix fragment parsing to unblock some people |
| 16:09 | <rubys> | annevk: go for it. Does it change test results? |
| 16:10 | <annevk> | rubys: yeah it would |
| 16:10 | <rubys> | can you update the test results at the same time? |
| 16:10 | <annevk> | rubys: also, I'll do it tomorrow likely since I'm not sure I've more time today |
| 16:10 | <annevk> | rubys: I will do that, but that's a distinct PR right? |
| 16:10 | <annevk> | to web-platform-tests? |
| 16:11 | <rubys> | yes, that's a distinct PR. |
| 16:11 | <annevk> | ok |
| 17:03 | <smaug____> | whaaat, https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/WebKit/Source/core/dom/ContainerNode.cpp&rcl=1418267803&l=693 |
| 17:03 | <smaug____> | that is crazy |
| 17:27 | <slightlyoff> | wanderview: DM me? |
| 17:27 | <krijnhoetmerbot> | MikeSmith: I'll think about you when I get filthy rich! :) |
| 17:38 | <annevk> | about:permissions <3 |
| 17:46 | <wanderview> | annevk: is that new? |
| 17:46 | <annevk> | wanderview: I don't know |
| 17:47 | <wanderview> | its nice... never seen it before, though |
| 17:47 | <annevk> | it misses a bunch of things, and usability is not great, but this is a good start at addressing this problem |
| 17:52 | <annevk> | wanderview: looks quite old looking at open bugs |
| 17:52 | <wanderview> | ah |
| 17:53 | <Domenic> | wow, I have never seen about:permissions either |
| 17:54 | <rubys> | Dominic: did you see https://url.spec.whatwg.org/interop/test-results/ ? |
| 17:54 | <annevk> | that but better is what the web needs |
| 17:55 | <Domenic> | rubys: yes, super-helpful :) |
| 17:56 | <Domenic> | rubys: a lot of the IE failures are presumably due to their disconnected <a> bug? |
| 17:56 | <rubys> | no, I worked around that |
| 17:56 | <Domenic> | oh interesting |
| 17:57 | <Domenic> | in that case stuff like https://url.spec.whatwg.org/interop/test-results/c8fef9a8b6?select=current is just bizarre |
| 17:57 | <Domenic> | i wonder if IE technical preview is better... |
| 17:57 | <wanderview> | annevk: I think maybe about:permissions is the same code driving the per-page info box (click the page lock icon in the url bar and more information button) |
| 17:58 | <rubys> | dominic: looks like I need to play with .htaccess a bit to make urls like that one work |
| 17:58 | <Domenic> | oh huh yeah I just copied the URL bar |
| 17:58 | <rubys> | since it is interactive, you can do things like "all current browsers vs IE": https://url.spec.whatwg.org/interop/test-results/?select=current&baseline=ie |
| 17:58 | <rubys> | Dominic: what you did, I want to enable. I will fix. |
| 17:59 | <annevk> | wanderview: that dialog is so slow due to e10s :-( |
| 17:59 | <wanderview> | yea... |
| 17:59 | <Domenic> | "/test.txt" http://www.example.com/test is the test I found surprising that IE fails |
| 19:14 | <JakeA> | annevk: I owe you a ticket on ServiceWorkerClient to WindowClient etc. It's my tomorrow morning. Sorry for the delay. |
| 19:14 | <JakeA> | Also going to look at clients.claim() |
| 19:17 | <annevk> | JakeA: sgtm |
| 20:30 | <aklein> | smaug____: that appendChild "nothing to do" line dates back at least to http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/1024 |
| 20:30 | <aklein> | bz, annevk: ^^ for possible amusement value |
| 20:31 | <aklein> | 13 years ago (!) |
| 20:37 | <smaug____> | hmm, when did Apple tell about Safari |
| 20:37 | <smaug____> | I thought ~2004 |
| 20:37 | <smaug____> | no, 2003 |
| 20:40 | <aklein> | it's hard to tell from that patch whether this hack was also in khtml at that point or whether it was added in this revision |
| 21:55 | <terinjokes> | anyone know what the discussion on the lack of headers in beacon came from? |
| 22:00 | <annevk> | https://twitter.com/mikewest/status/543139903933280256 (mainly replies) :/ |
| 22:02 | <tantek> | The CR publishing will continue until the formal objections start? |
| 22:02 | <Ms2ger> | s/until the formal objections start// |
| 22:03 | <annevk> | Publishing will continue until editors give up |
| 22:03 | <tantek> | censorship! |
| 22:04 | <annevk> | But mainly, it seems bad to publish something as CR if you know it's not actually a workable solution |
| 22:04 | <tantek> | annevk: correct. it is against W3C process to even go to Last Call if there are known substantial open issues. |
| 22:04 | <tantek> | nevermind CR. |
| 22:04 | <tantek> | but even the new LCCR. |