00:24
<TabAtkins>
Domenic: Do you use Bikeshed's piping features?
00:32
<MikeSmith>
in Mozilla bug reviews, what is rs=me
00:35
<heycam>
rubberstamp
00:35
<heycam>
a review without closely at the patch
00:42
<MikeSmith>
heycam: ah ok, thanks
08:29
<MikeSmith>
is location.assign(location.hash) is reasonable workaround to force navigation to the right anchor
08:30
<MikeSmith>
in a case where other script from a page is causing it to fail to scroll to the right place
08:32
MikeSmith
is trying to troubleshoot a buggy document and would prefer to workaround it rather than wade through its gobs of jquery-based script trying to figure out what's preventing it from scrolling to the expected anchor
09:03
<jgraham>
MikeSmith: Web development advice? Tried #html-wg? ;)
09:06
<darobin>
hahahaha
09:06
<darobin>
MikeSmith: I'm not sure that'll work if the browser thinks it's already at the hash, no?
09:08
<darobin>
MikeSmith: this is how it's solved in ReSpec https://github.com/w3c/respec/blob/develop/js/core/location-hash.js
09:25
MikeSmith
looks
09:28
<darobin>
MikeSmith: that code does some tricks to detect whether the user has already scrolled during load (so as not to re-scroll them back to the anchor)
09:28
<darobin>
you might not need that
09:29
<darobin>
but the heart of the trick is to unset location.hash, then set it again
09:29
<darobin>
IIRC nothing else worked, at least when that code was written
09:31
<MikeSmith>
darobin: The location.assign(location.hash) way does work for me in my problem case, which is: location.hash does already have the right value (the anchor I want to scroll to) but other existing (broken) script on the page has caused it to scroll to the wrong place
09:32
<darobin>
MikeSmith: it's quite possible that the code I'm pointing you to was written to address a browser that is no longer an issue
09:40
<MikeSmith>
jgraham: you're getting more like Ms2ger in your old age
09:40
<Ms2ger>
Get off our lawn
09:40
<jgraham>
Maybe I am Ms2ger
09:41
<MikeSmith>
or maybe y'all are actually twin brothers separated at birth
09:41
<Ms2ger>
Has anyone ever seen us in the same room anyway?
09:41
<MikeSmith>
I did, in a dream
09:41
<MikeSmith>
I won't go into the details
09:42
<Ms2ger>
tmi already
09:42
<MikeSmith>
heh
11:40
<MikeSmith>
darobin: in https://lists.mozilla.org/pipermail/dev-platform/2015-June/010235.html you must mean linked data is deployed to millions of *pages*, right? (not millions of domains)
11:58
<darobin>
MikeSmith: no, domains
11:58
<darobin>
counting pages is pretty useless
11:58
<darobin>
some of those sites have infinite URL spaces
11:59
<darobin>
I have it on very good authority, I didn't include the source because I'm not sure that I can quote it
12:00
<darobin>
MikeSmith: search engines and social networks do useful stuff with that, it's not surprising that it's successful
12:00
<darobin>
there's a huge incentive
12:49
<MikeSmith>
darobin: so yeah I see that https://schema.org/ says "Over 10 million sites use Schema.org to markup their web pages and email messages."
12:50
<MikeSmith>
(dunno how a site can use it mark up email messages though)
12:51
<MikeSmith>
I also see that Guha said back at the end of 2013, "about 15 percent of the pages we crawl have schema.org markup... Now over 5 million sites are using it."
12:51
<MikeSmith>
http://www.dataversity.net/schema-org-chat-googles-r-v-guha/
12:52
<MikeSmith>
still I count that as a success measure specifically for schema.org rather than for Linked Data in general
12:52
<darobin>
MikeSmith: there you go
12:52
<darobin>
MikeSmith: FYI it was 7 million at TPAC
12:53
<MikeSmith>
yeah clearly it's still growing
12:55
<MikeSmith>
darobin: also 10 million sites is still only 3% or 4% of the sites on the Web, right?
12:55
<darobin>
MikeSmith: yeah, but it's not a random 10 million, most are from the top destinations
12:55
<MikeSmith>
sure
12:56
<darobin>
MikeSmith: re email, it does stuff in GMail (and some other clients)
12:56
<darobin>
I'm sure Google can measure that :)
12:57
<darobin>
in fact it's the only way of adding interactivity to email, so that's another big incentive
14:23
<Domenic>
TabAtkins: I do not think I use Bikeshed's piping features.
17:55
<TabAtkins>
Domenic: Cool, no problem then. Pretty sure krit is the only person who is. Just turning off the auto-piping, as it's a misfeature.