| 08:58 | <JakeA> | Domenic: ping me when you're awake, we should start thinking about cancellable promises again |
| 13:51 | <Domenic> | JakeA: awake, but commuting/breakfasting for the next hour-ish |
| 13:52 | <JakeA> | Domenic: no rush, still catching up stuff too. I imagine the next step of the plan is investigate bluebird, but I'd like your take on it. Ping me when you're free. |
| 13:54 | <wanderview> | JakeA: maybe the SW f2f date got finalized in person or something? last email I have is from May 1 |
| 13:55 | <JakeA> | wanderview: hmm, you're right, slightlyoff mentioned that date, but it was internal. Will hold off on flight bookings. |
| 13:56 | <JakeA> | Cheers! |
| 13:56 | <wanderview> | well, someone has to just pick a date sometime :-) |
| 13:56 | <wanderview> | July 20 works for me |
| 13:57 | <wanderview> | at least when the robots take over the AI should do a better job of meeting scheduling |
| 16:22 | <jgraham> | Hmm, so I'm looking at script executionm in WebDriver. I have an ES Function (from "Create a Function Object"), but it isn't really clear to me if I can just call [[Call]] on it, or if I need to do something with creating a script setting a code entry point and then jumping to that code entry point |
| 16:22 | <Ms2ger> | Probably the latter |
| 16:24 | <jgraham> | This is what I fear |
| 16:27 | <jgraham> | It seems like the existing machinary for actually invoking a function like that is defined in WebIDL |
| 16:37 | <Ms2ger> | jgraham, is this servo? |
| 16:58 | <jgraham> | Ms2ger: No, it's the spec |
| 16:58 | <Ms2ger> | Oh |
| 16:58 | <Ms2ger> | Yeah, use IDL abstractions always |
| 16:59 | <jgraham> | Right, but there isn't actually a DOM API involved anywhere :) |
| 17:13 | <jgraham> | Yeah, it pretty much feels like WebIDL isn't the right thing here since it does a bunch of converting to IDL types that I really don't want |
| 18:42 | <Domenic> | I don't think IDL actually handles globals and executoin contexts anyways... that's one of the big open issues |
| 18:49 | <bradleymeck> | i think that may be a bit difficult if you are wanting languages to be agnostic |
| 18:49 | <bradleymeck> | to be language agnostic* |
| 18:50 | <Domenic> | nobody wants that |
| 18:51 | <bradleymeck> | at one time Java was tracking DOM APIs /shrug |
| 19:35 | <wanderview> | Domenic: whatever happened to the wrapper alternative? |
| 19:43 | <TabAtkins> | bradleymeck: WebIDL stopped trying to be language-agnostic years ago, tho. It's just a JS description language now. |
| 20:40 | <jgraham> | Hixie: You around? Do you know the answer to my script-injection question above? |