| 00:04 | <MikeSmith> | cvrebert: the only people who have push access to that repo at this point are W3C staff |
| 00:04 | <MikeSmith> | why do you ask? |
| 00:05 | <cvrebert> | MikeSmith: Trying to find out who to ping to merge my PR: https://github.com/w3c/css-validator/pull/10 |
| 00:05 | <MikeSmith> | we're not going to keep that repo |
| 00:06 | <MikeSmith> | it will end up getting overwritten when somebody (probably me) finally pushes the current code in the cvs repo to there |
| 00:07 | <cvrebert> | Ah. I eagerly await that clobbering then :-) |
| 00:07 | <MikeSmith> | yeah sorry it's not been done already |
| 00:08 | <MikeSmith> | the thing that's holding me up from doing that right now is, doing a mapping of the names of the contributors in the cvs repo to their github usernames, so that the history will be as it should be |
| 00:08 | <cvrebert> | eh, things happen :-) |
| 00:09 | <MikeSmith> | cvrebert: well please remind me about this again some time soon |
| 00:10 | <MikeSmith> | I may be able to do it today but I doubt it |
| 00:11 | cvrebert | adds a calendar reminder |
| 00:32 | <MikeSmith> | botie, inform cvrebert it would be helpful if you just close https://github.com/w3c/css-validator/pull/10, since it's not going to end up getting merged. (P.S. I'm putting together the username mappings for the repo migration right now.) |
| 00:32 | <botie> | will do |
| 00:33 | <MikeSmith> | TabAtkins: might you know if Bert has a github account? |
| 00:33 | <TabAtkins> | MikeSmith: No clue! |
| 00:34 | <MikeSmith> | yeah I reckoned :) |
| 00:34 | <MikeSmith> | figured it was worth a try |
| 00:34 | MikeSmith | peruses https://github.com/w3c/csswg-test/graphs/contributors |
| 00:35 | <MikeSmith> | oh astearns, know if Bert has a github account? |
| 00:36 | <astearns> | I don't know, but my guess would be no |
| 00:36 | <MikeSmith> | ok |
| 01:35 | <ssyrain> | Hi good people. I got messy code when `fetch` Chinese. |
| 01:35 | <ssyrain> | tried on both Chrome and Firefox, is this a issue of `whatwg-fetch` or Chrome/Firefox? |
| 01:37 | <ssyrain> | @channel |
| 01:44 | <TabAtkins> | ssyrain: @channel is a Slack thing, not an IRC thing. |
| 01:44 | <TabAtkins> | ssyrain: But what do you mean by "got messy code when `fetch` Chinese"? |
| 01:46 | <ssyrain> | when server respond with Chinese text with `utf-8` setted in response header, `fetch` can not recognize that and i got messy text. |
| 01:47 | <ssyrain> | when i changed to XmlHTTPRequest, Chinese text can be recognized |
| 01:49 | <TabAtkins> | If fetch() and XMLHttpRequest are acting different for the Content-Type header, it's a bug. Please report it! |
| 07:10 | <botie> | cvrebert, at 2015-08-05 00:32 UTC, MikeSmith said: it would be helpful if you just close https://github.com/w3c/css-validator/pull/10, since it's not going to end up getting merged. (P.S. I'm putting together the username mappings for the repo migration right now.) |
| 07:11 | <cvrebert> | Did that long ago :-) |
| 07:13 | <Ms2ger> | You should hang around here more often :) |
| 11:28 | <MikeSmith> | hsivonen: https://html5.validator.nu/ and https://validator.nu/ both 502 atm |
| 13:09 | <darobin> | Domenic: I don't know what your plans are for the WHATCG, but if you want to automate checks that PRs come from people who've signed the CG CLA (i.e. are members in it) feel free to use https://labs.w3.org/hatchery/ash-nazg/ |
| 13:09 | <darobin> | happy to send you further details if it helps |
| 13:11 | <Domenic> | darobin: oh very cool. philipj ^ |
| 13:11 | <darobin> | Domenic: it's just a click for me to add the WHATCG as one of the groups using that |
| 13:11 | <darobin> | there are still bugs, but it's used by the WICG and WebRTC WG already |
| 13:12 | <Domenic> | darobin: example of it in action? |
| 13:12 | <Ms2ger> | nazg for Nazgul? |
| 13:13 | <darobin> | Domenic: if you look at https://github.com/ResponsiveImagesCG/picture-element/pull/270 for instance you can see that it has IPR checks passing |
| 13:13 | <darobin> | whereas https://github.com/w3c-test/test-live/pull/1 doesn't |
| 13:13 | <Domenic> | darobin: excellent, full integration instead of google-cla-bot style nagging comments |
| 13:13 | <darobin> | Ms2ger: close enough, ash-nazg is the one ring |
| 13:14 | <darobin> | Domenic: yeah, it's basically just a status hook |
| 13:14 | <darobin> | when you create a repo through it, or import a repo into it, it adds the hook |
| 13:14 | <Domenic> | would be nice if clicking "Details" didn't ask me for mega-permissions |
| 13:14 | <darobin> | yeah |
| 13:14 | <Ms2ger> | Ah |
| 13:14 | <philipj> | Domenic, darobin, that sounds cool! |
| 13:14 | <darobin> | getting granularity with the GitHub API isn't simple |
| 13:15 | <darobin> | or at least, I couldn't find a simple way to make it work |
| 13:15 | <Domenic> | yeah i've heard that from a lot of people |
| 13:15 | <Domenic> | still surprised that "details" can't go to a "this is what this check is about" page |
| 13:15 | <darobin> | and since the tool needs to create repos, add files, add hooks for some of its functions, it's a bit of a PITA |
| 13:15 | <philipj> | darobin: does it just check the committer, or can the commit say where the idea came from somehow? |
| 13:16 | <darobin> | Domenic: I'm sure I can remove the login requirement on some pages; it's mostly a question of making sure the UI still makes sense and doesn't offer affordances for stuff you can't do |
| 13:16 | <darobin> | philipj: when you create a PR you can add comments to it with +@whoever to add someone, or -@someone to remove them |
| 13:16 | <darobin> | so yeah, you can get an idea from someone else and track that |
| 13:17 | <darobin> | (and even remove yourself as PR author) |
| 13:17 | <philipj> | darobin: awesomeness |
| 13:17 | <darobin> | it's pretty new, it has its rough edges |
| 13:17 | <darobin> | notably it doesn't mind if a PR has no contributors :) |
| 13:17 | <darobin> | also, mapping CG participants to GH usernames is semi-manual |
| 13:18 | <philipj> | for divinely inspired changes, presumably? |
| 13:18 | <darobin> | (but since you typically only have few contributors, the admin overhead isn't too bad) |
| 13:18 | <darobin> | lol |
| 13:18 | <darobin> | I've got some docs in an email, I need to put them up |
| 13:18 | <darobin> | anyway, I just wanted to say that if you folks want it it's there for you to use |
| 13:19 | <darobin> | and of course the source is available, yadda yadda |
| 13:19 | <darobin> | right now it creates repos that follow the WICG template, which isn't the same one you'd want — but that can be hacked in |
| 13:21 | <Domenic> | i'd kind of prefer not to create repos from it |
| 13:23 | <darobin> | that's fine, but in order for a repo to be managed by it you'd need to at least import them |
| 13:24 | <darobin> | and the current behaviour is that'll create files if they're not there :) |
| 13:25 | <darobin> | anyway, if you think it could be useful but with some changes, in a few weeks' time we can just sit down together to hash something out :) |
| 17:40 | <hsivonen> | MikeSmith: thanks. the validator is back up now. |
| 17:41 | hsivonen | seriously needs to automate the response to this situation |
| 17:45 | <MikeSmith> | hsivonen: thanks |
| 18:44 | <wanderview> | I wish github had a better way to show diffs on html files |
| 18:58 | <Domenic> | http://services.w3.org/htmldiff can sometimes help |
| 20:27 | annevk | misses context for https://twitter.com/W3CmemesExposed/status/628873727271415808 |