| 10:25 | <rits> | annevk: Hello, No i didn't submit a proposal for outreachy yet, |
| 10:30 | <annevk> | rits: okay, but you are aware that is needed? |
| 10:30 | <annevk> | rits: I realized that if you just found out about this project through Twitter you might not have seen the application process |
| 10:32 | <rits> | annevk: no i knew about the outreachy too, i have started making the project's proposal |
| 10:33 | <annevk> | rits: you can get help with questions regarding Outreachy on Mozilla IRC's #outreachy too |
| 10:34 | <rits> | annevk: ok, i will clear some of my doubts about outreachy there, thanks |
| 10:36 | <rits> | annevk: As Mozilla have not given any particular details for the proposal, i am following the proposal format given on the outreachy page, is it fine? |
| 10:36 | <annevk> | rits: yeah |
| 10:36 | <rits> | annevk: ok great! :) |
| 10:36 | <annevk> | rits: Mozilla is the sponsor of the projects |
| 10:36 | <annevk> | rits: well, the projects outlined on the Mozilla wiki |
| 10:38 | <rits> | annevk: yeah, ok |
| 11:59 | <annevk> | mkwst: https://github.com/mikewest/internetdrafts/commit/7c538ce3642a7b449b02c32e1bbca091f5f822fa what about changing ports? |
| 11:59 | <annevk> | mkwst: seems like Origin might still be a better term |
| 11:59 | <mkwst> | 1. I uploaded that ~4m ago. You are stalking me. |
| 12:02 | <mkwst> | I changed it to "host" because we can't take ports into consideration with cookies today. We just don't have the data in the database. I kinda like that the prefix proposal just takes the tools we have in the garage today, and forces their application. |
| 12:02 | <mkwst> | I'm starting to think that https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-origin-cookies-01 is probably not worth doing if we can do this, as it gives 90% of the benefit with 0% of the work. |
| 12:03 | <mkwst> | it would continue to leak across ports, and wouldn't work for non-secure origins, but those are small risks compared to today. |
| 12:04 | <annevk> | perhaps with a further HSTS extension that forces 443 as port for HTTP we could close the remaining gap? |
| 12:05 | <mkwst> | Sounds like a better use of our time than poking at the cookie spec. |
| 12:05 | <mkwst> | meeting. back in a bit. |
| 13:49 | <siddhism> | clear |
| 18:09 | <Domenic> | botie, tell calvaris Hey, any thoughts on the licensing issues for https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/397 ? |
| 18:10 | <botie> | will do |