10:32
<benjamingr_>
Hey, I'm noticing a browser (Chrome) rendering the contents of a <style> tag (inlined for saving requests) to the page. Is there anything that might cause a browser to do this?
10:34
<yoav>
broken HTML, so the <style> is not parsed as one? Do you see something different for the same HTML in say Firefox?
10:38
<benjamingr_>
It's just a little `<style>`, not 30 lines long, - it doesn't happen in firefox. I'll run the validator again just in case.
10:39
<yoav>
benjamingr_: can you post an example?
10:39
<benjamingr_>
It's at https://tipranks.com , it looks like this when it's messed up:
10:39
<benjamingr_>
http://i.stack.imgur.com/PSKSi.png
10:54
<Ms2ger>
benjamingr_, does it always happen?
11:03
<benjamingr_>
No, only once in a while.
11:40
<bblfish>
anyone from the streams api here? https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#model
11:40
<bblfish>
How does one know what type of Chunk one gets back?
11:42
<bblfish>
does one have to write code with a big if (chunk.value type ...) else if (chunk.value hastype ... ) else if (.... )
12:40
<jochen__>
is it currently possible to mark something as exposed on service workers in html?
12:40
<philipj>
where's annevk today?
12:40
<jochen__>
as in Exposed=(Window,Worker,ServiceWorker)
12:41
<jochen__>
hiding :)
12:41
<philipj>
if the new reality is that Worker doesn't mean *Worker, then perhaps that shorthand should be purged from specs so it's always spelled out
12:44
<philipj>
jochen__: it looks like in Blink, Worker exands to CompositorWorker+DedicatedWorker+SharedWorker+ServiceWorker, in v8_utilities.py. That doesn't seem right?
12:45
<jochen__>
let me check
12:47
<jochen__>
seems to be the case
12:47
<philipj>
jochen__: let me see if the generated code is affected...
12:48
<jochen__>
at least the tests still pass
12:48
<jochen__>
and they explicitly run on service workers as well...
12:49
<philipj>
jochen__: and the generated code doesn't change
12:49
<philipj>
in which case everything seems to be sane, just a redundant bit in Blink's IDL