08:55
<JakeA>
wanderview: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=567615
10:18
<zcorpan>
MikeSmith: why this warning?
10:18
<zcorpan>
Warning: Element dl does not need a role attribute.
10:18
<zcorpan>
From line 4468, column 4; to line 4468, column 32
10:18
<zcorpan>
</pre>↩ <dl class="note" role="note">↩ <
10:21
<zcorpan>
MikeSmith: also i seem to get a 504 Gateway Time-out from validator.nu and html5.validator.nu
10:36
<MikeSmith>
hsivonen: validator.nu and html5.validator.nu trouble
10:38
<MikeSmith>
zcorpan: yeah that's warning for that case seems like a bug
10:38
<MikeSmith>
I think the ARIA in HTML spec actually says no role value is allowed on dl at all
10:39
MikeSmith
looks at validator sources
12:32
<ondras>
so
12:32
<ondras>
is there some authoritative statement regarding the extension presence in "import x from 'y{.js}'" ?
12:33
<ondras>
babel6 seems to encourage extension-less module names
12:33
<ondras>
babel5 supports both
12:33
<ondras>
and as time goes, I have heard people recommending both variants.
12:40
<hsivonen>
MikeSmith: fixed
15:47
<caitp>
ondras: have you looked at the loader repo?
15:48
<caitp>
haven't really been keeping up with it, but I expect the extension will be required
15:50
<caitp>
or rather, it won't add the ".js" for you
17:13
<JakeA>
annevk: if an API isn't available (private browsing, or missing dependencies), should the API be there but fail, or be absent?
17:13
<JakeA>
I vaguely recall a discussion about this
18:17
<Domenic>
ondras: since you are just using Babel's nonstandard version of modules you should do whatever babel says. It's not real ES6 anyway.
18:50
<jsbell>
Ms2ger: can I get a do-over on https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/6039 ?
18:50
<Ms2ger>
mtg
18:50
<jsbell>
np
18:50
<Ms2ger>
Also all of this week :)
18:51
<Ms2ger>
But will try to look later, thanks for the fix
18:51
<jsbell>
In unrelated news, for t in $ALL_THE_TOOLS { I hate $t }
18:51
<Ms2ger>
:D
19:10
<wanderview>
JakeA: thanks!
19:12
<annevk>
JakeA: not sure that is standardized
19:13
<annevk>
JakeA: absent seems safe when it does not work, but private browsing has its own considerations
19:33
<JakeA>
Cheers
19:51
<mkwst>
JakeA: Generally, we'd like private/incognito/whatever to look just like "real" mode.
19:52
<mkwst>
Practically, we fall down in a number of places, so Incognito is totally detectable. I see that as a bug, I just haven't really been able to convince folks who know how to fix things to agree with my prioritizations. :)
19:53
<JakeA>
mkwst: in this case we're trying to work out if we expose background sync if the version of play services isn't recent enough
19:53
<JakeA>
Either expose it and it rejects, or not expose it
20:12
<ondras>
caitp: what repo exactly?
20:13
<caitp>
https://github.com/whatwg/loader
20:13
<caitp>
although it looks like the "name resolution" bit still hasn't been figured out
20:13
<ondras>
caitp: thanks for the link, will have a look
20:13
<ondras>
would love to reply do Domenic, but he already left
20:13
<ondras>
will try again tomorrow.
20:14
<Domenic>
OR DID HE
20:14
<caitp>
he's around
20:14
<ondras>
MAGIC
20:14
<ondras>
why did my irssi fail to complete the nick
20:14
<ondras>
mystery.
20:14
<ondras>
Domenic: so please point me to the real ES6 way then
20:15
<ondras>
Domenic: I know how to do stuff with Babel; I am now more interested in what is the real deal going to be
20:15
<Domenic>
ondras: there is no defined way yet. That is why modules are not implemented anywhere.
20:15
<ondras>
right
20:15
<Domenic>
Babel just made something up so they could ship
20:15
<ondras>
Domenic: my point is that perhaps people are converging onto something? or still 50/50?
20:15
<caitp>
Domenic: it's probably likely that the behaviour will be similar to other resources loaded by the browser
20:16
<Domenic>
ondras: I would bet with 80% odds on the .js being required, as caitp says. But there's a substantial amount of uncertainty still.
20:16
<ondras>
Domenic: okay, thanks. Precisely the opinion I was looking for.
20:16
<ondras>
(I submitted this as babel6 bug not long ago, no reply so far...)
20:17
<Domenic>
I prefer not to use things that are unspecified though
20:17
<caitp>
iirc the confusing bit was WRT relative-to-base vs relative-to-module-uri
20:17
<caitp>
or something like that
20:17
<Domenic>
vs. relative-to-module-id
22:04
<smaug____>
mounir: random question came to my mind: is blink going to support BroadcastChannel any time soon?
22:27
<Mek>
smaug____: I don't think anybody is actively working on it, but according to https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/4585496197988352 jsbell might be able to give a more concrete answer
23:05
<jsbell>
smaug____: No concrete answer for me, though I'd love to see it done. Just not a high priority
23:43
<nikkibee>
I'm working on implementing more of the Fetch standard for Servo, and in talking with a previous developer on that, we discovered the Fetch standard had updated since they last worked with it
23:44
<nikkibee>
how often can I expect the Fetch standard to update with new details? is there like a general completeness rating for it?
23:45
<nikkibee>
I'd like knowing more about the development of it, which isn't really apparent from glancing at like git commits