| 08:06 | <annevk> | jyasskin: I was thinking you'd have addressed the outstanding comments, so I guess I'll leave it open a little longer |
| 08:07 | <annevk> | jyasskin: I'm also happy to do some of the rephrasing, let me know |
| 17:54 | <jyasskin> | annevk: Sorry about that; I ran into the weekend. I'll get the "Let foo be the result of requesting ..." change to Permissions on Monday. |
| 17:56 | <jyasskin> | annevk: Passing {foo: "bar"} to a WebIDL type should be the result of parsing the thing as Javascript and then converting it. I could say that everywhere or put a "conventions" section at the bottom, or try to get it into WebIDL. The easiest thing for the storage spec would be for me to define the PermissionName shorthand in Permissions, since Storage |
| 17:56 | <jyasskin> | doesn't actually need full descriptors. |