| 00:35 | <domfarolino> | Do |actualResponse| and |response| point to the same object in HTTP fetch after https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-concept-http-network-or-cache-fetch ? |
| 01:28 | <domfarolino> | (aka does modifying one modify the other) |
| 10:49 | <yoav> | annevk: if I were to revamp the Client hints PR to only define the required infrastructure, but without referring to any specific hints/features, what level of support from Mozilla/Apple would be required for me to land that? |
| 10:50 | <yoav> | e.g. I have heard from individuals in both that they'd be interested in the CH infrastructure for UA client hints and save-data, but not necessarily for other features |
| 10:51 | <yoav> | is that enough? Or is an official position needed? (e.g. on the mozilla standards position repo) |
| 11:37 | <annevk> | yoav: how likely is it that two or more UAs would use the infrastructure for the same thing? |
| 11:39 | <annevk> | domfarolino: aye |
| 11:53 | <yoav> | annevk: I can't speak for Mozilla, but https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/202 is something I heard multiple folks interested in |
| 11:53 | <yoav> | so I'd expect that to be the most likely use of the infrastructure |
| 11:53 | <annevk> | Last I heard that's not a yes for Mozilla |
| 11:54 | <yoav> | hmm, ok |
| 11:55 | <annevk> | So yeah, signals from individuals are likely not sufficient, but if they're willing to scribble something there it might lead to something |
| 11:55 | <annevk> | For Apple, if you have a yes from Youenn, say, that'd be interesting |
| 11:59 | <yoav> | OK, thanks. I'll try to herd individuals to comment. We'll see where it gets me |