| 17:15 | <domfarolino> | annevk: Do you think you’ll have time this week for another pass on the lazyload PR? |
| 17:15 | <annevk> | domfarolino: for sure, didn't realize it was blocking on me |
| 17:16 | <annevk> | domfarolino: do we have tests? |
| 17:16 | <annevk> | domfarolino: I put a reminder in for tomorrow |
| 17:16 | <domfarolino> | annevk: np. Some, not all. Rob is writing some, I may be able to write others soonish |
| 17:17 | <domfarolino> | Cool thank you |
| 17:17 | <annevk> | domfarolino: I guess part of the question is if we now have unambiguous wording for the various tests we imagined |
| 17:18 | <annevk> | domfarolino: including constructing the image outside the tree and such |
| 17:21 | <domfarolino> | annevk: Yeah, I believe we do but I also want to take another look. RE outside-the-tree, I believe said image is not considered intersecting the viewport, but I also don’t know much about “CSS boxes” |
| 17:22 | <annevk> | domfarolino: ah yeah, that algorithm (if generalized from video) would return false so lazyload would kick in I guess, which is nice |
| 17:22 | <annevk> | anyway, tomorrow 🙂 |
| 17:23 | <domfarolino> | (for explicitly loading=lazy adorned images, that is) |
| 17:23 | <domfarolino> | Sg! |
| 18:45 | <annevk> | Heh, MDN didn't care to document ProcessingInstruction |
| 18:45 | <annevk> | Or at least not in a way that MikeSmith's annotator picked up |
| 21:35 | <domfarolino> | annevk: Could a visibility:hidden image "intersect" with the viewport? from reading around, I believe the answer is yes. |
| 21:42 | <astearns> | domfarolino: I expect it should - it's still taking up a defined space |
| 21:43 | <domfarolino> | astearns: That is what I think too, thanks. I think display:none would never "intersect" the viewport however |
| 21:45 | <astearns> | that's my expectation, too |
| 21:45 | <astearns> | (standard caveat about applying logic) |
| 21:54 | <MikeSmith> | annevk: if the annotator didn't pick it up, that's either because there's no MDN article for it, or else because there is an MDN article, but it has no link to the DOM spec |