| 03:25 | <TimothyGu> | alright, gonna do my share of spam tagging |
| 10:41 | <annevk> | zcorpan_: you'll enjoy https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1310888119898529792 |
| 10:41 | <annevk> | (iirc you wrote that algorithm) |
| 15:27 | <annevk> | Domenic: did you email Digital Ocean to opt out? |
| 15:28 | <Domenic> | annevk: yep. As I predicted though, it's not like the spammers check DigitalOcean's internal opt-out list before spamming us... |
| 15:28 | <annevk> | uhuh |
| 15:30 | <noamr> | Morning TabAtkins, pinging you again regarding EXIF orientation/resolution |
| 16:04 | <annevk> | noamr: I can have another look next week, but what I'd really like to see is some progress on the implementation side; might be worth emailing heycam and I for Firefox, not entirely sure for other browsers |
| 16:06 | <annevk> | noamr: that is, we have a safe solution, but if it's not getting shipped we need to know why |
| 16:06 | <annevk> | (and to be clear, I'm not a big fan of trying to solve this metadata-piece-by-metadata-piece, so I'd rather start with resolution which already shipped) |
| 16:08 | <noamr> | annevk you mean orientation |
| 16:08 | <annevk> | noamr: oh yes |
| 16:09 | <noamr> | I can create patches for chromium/safari myself, and see what responses it gets |
| 16:09 | <annevk> | noamr: sounds amazing |
| 16:09 | <annevk> | Take care, gonna call it a day |
| 16:09 | <noamr> | Cool. Enjoy the evening . Thanks! |
| 17:11 | <Domenic> | Flash is getting removed from Chrome |
| 17:12 | <Domenic> | If that was the last plugin, I wonder if we can simplify HTML |
| 17:12 | <Domenic> | But, PDF viewers might still count as plugins... |
| 17:12 | <Domenic> | And <embed> and <object> can embed HTML pages... |
| 17:23 | <andreubotella> | It seems to me like PDFs would count as "non-document content" in the page load algorithms, so the plugin section could be removed |
| 17:36 | <Domenic> | Ah, yeah, that one definitely seems promising |
| 17:54 | <Domenic> | Filed https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6003 |
| 21:15 | <devsnek> | annevk: tbh i would leave the invalid label on 5982 cuz its extraordinarily unlikely they will update it further |