| 01:37 | <croraf> | Anyone knows if there is a public IRC or something to ask questions about Webaudio API? |
| 10:41 | <MikeSmith> | annevk: For dictionary names in specs, conforming implementations aren’t required to implement actual representations with those names, right? |
| 10:42 | <MikeSmith> | I mean, since the dictionary names aren’t observable or testable from web content |
| 10:42 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: correct |
| 10:42 | <MikeSmith> | OK |
| 10:42 | <MikeSmith> | thanks |
| 10:43 | <MikeSmith> | the context is https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/issues/7287 |
| 10:43 | <MikeSmith> | and related issues |
| 10:43 | <annevk> | MikeSmith: this is also a big hesitation I have with just exposing those names to content, since they're not at all consistently named |
| 10:43 | <MikeSmith> | yeah |
| 10:43 | <MikeSmith> | well for BCD I wish we could get rid of them |
| 10:44 | <MikeSmith> | ...and instead just deal with their members as parameter for the actual methods that in the spec reference them |
| 10:45 | <MikeSmith> | or as return types |
| 16:02 | <Domenic> | Stong +1 |
| 16:23 | <benjamingr__> | Hey, I'm trying to start learning bikeshed to try to contribute a fix and when checkout out the whatwg/dom repo (from master) and building it I get the following error: "FATAL ERROR: Obsolete biblio ref: [ElementTraversal] is replaced by [DOM]." - anything obvious I'm missing? |
| 16:24 | <annevk> | benjamingr__: no, it'll be sorted later today |
| 16:27 | <annevk> | benjamingr__: if you pull again it should be okay |
| 16:40 | <benjamingr__> | Great, thanks anne! |
| 17:31 | <benjamingr__> | I have an initial set of changes - they are probably wrong and I don't want to waste your time, would it be OK if I opened a draft PR for feedback and guidance :]? |
| 17:44 | <Domenic> | benjamingr__: go for it |
| 17:49 | <benjamingr__> | yay, thanks! https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/919 |
| 18:12 | <annevk> | So I noticed that PR Previews no longer have the usual "not a standard" disclaimer |
| 18:12 | <annevk> | I guess that regressed when we fixing things up for Review Drafts and Commit Snapshots? Sigh |
| 18:12 | <annevk> | I guess I can have a look tomorrow |
| 18:16 | <benjamingr__> | Thanks for the review Domenic ! I'll read this carefully and try to address the comments (it's already evening here, so probably tomorrow so I'm focused and make fewer mistakes) :] |
| 18:16 | <Domenic> | benjamingr__: awesome, sounds like a plan! |
| 18:17 | <Domenic> | annevk: oh eek, yeah I wonder how that happened. Hopefully an easy fix... |