| 02:56 | <ljharb> | The problem space already has stage 1 imo |
| 02:57 | <ljharb> | I’d argue that if we have a solution that’s tenable, it could jump straight to stage 2, marking the other ones as inactive as a result. |
| 03:38 | <jschoi> | FYI: I asked for one hour of discussion. https://github.com/tc39/agendas/pull/1106 |
| 03:39 | <jschoi> | I just realized that you may have been referring to adding call-this to the big diagram. I’ll see what I can do with that. |
| 03:41 | <jschoi> | I’m not sure whether I would nest call-this’s block within the intersection of bind-this’s block, extensions’ block, and the pipe operator’s block. If not there, then where would it go…? Maybe outside to the left of bind-this, below PFA syntax…? |
| 03:42 | <jschoi> | (Also, Tab, if you want to co-present during that discussion block, since you wrote an article about the proposals, too—feel free to submit a commit suggestion to #1106, or your own pull request if #1106 gets merged before then.) |