| 16:53 | <jschoi> | At the next plenary, I am planning to present the results of the dataflow ad-hoc meeting (as well as the results of the recent function-helpers incubator meeting), with an eye towards future advancement of the pipe operator and a bind/call-this operator. Hopefully that sounds good to everyone. |
| 16:54 | <jschoi> | I also plan to ask for time to bikeshed both the topic reference and the syntax of bind/call-this. |
| 16:55 | <jschoi> | I’ll try to have slides for these by March 18. |
| 17:25 | <TabAtkins> | Yes, that matches what I was expecting. So just to be clear - we're asking the committee to help decide the topic reference this meeting, but not asking for Stage 2 yet, right? That'll be next meeting, assuming the bikeshedding concludes satisfactorily? |
| 17:50 | <jschoi> | Yes, that matches what I was expecting. So just to be clear - we're asking the committee to help decide the topic reference this meeting, but not asking for Stage 2 yet, right? That'll be next meeting, assuming the bikeshedding concludes satisfactorily? |
| 17:52 | <jschoi> | There are cross-cutting concerns between the pipe operator and bind/call-this for Jordan, so I want to try to have them not stay too far apart in process. |
| 17:52 | <jschoi> | Also, Tab, did you mean Stage 3 for pipe in the following plenary? |
| 17:53 | <TabAtkins> | yes |
| 17:53 | <TabAtkins> | the next stage |
| 17:53 | <TabAtkins> | whichever |