19:49 | <littledan> | We really need to execute on improving the motivation section of the async context readme, especially for the web use cases. Here's a summary of use cases I have in mind:
|
19:49 | <littledan> | Every time I talk with a web person about this proposal, they are confused for this exact reason |
19:50 | <littledan> | Can someone take the action to make a PR to the async context readme on this topic? If not, please let me know and I'll try to eventually do it (but might not have time before this meeting) |
19:51 | <littledan> | also: Are we putting AsyncContext on the agenda for this TC39 meeting? We need to decide by tomorrow and add it if so. |
19:52 | <Andreu Botella> | Chengzhong mentioned in the WinterCG meeting that the idea was to propose it for stage 2 for this TC39 plenary |
19:53 | <littledan> | Good, let's put it on the agenda then |
19:54 | <littledan> | it will need to have this web motivation better documented for this plenary |
19:54 | <littledan> | This will also be important to have written down significantly before the March 16th WebPerf WG call which will discuss AsyncContext |
19:56 | <Andreu Botella> | is there some link for the react use case? |
19:57 | <littledan> | (I only know of the description in Justin's slides... IMO the others are sufficient to start with) |
19:57 | <Andreu Botella> | ok, I'll make a PR for that |
19:58 | <littledan> | Thanks! |
21:31 | <Justin Ridgewell> | What’s WebPerf WG? |
22:05 | <littledan> | https://www.w3.org/webperf/ |
22:05 | <littledan> | I think a lot of the strongest use cases for AsyncContext in the web are around performance metrics, so we're going to discuss this there. |
23:08 | <Ben Newman (Apollo, @benjamn on GH)> | If we (non-champions) have additional use cases to suggest, should we open issues on the proposal repo? Or sketch them here? |
23:19 | <littledan> | Either an issue, here, or an explainer PR would all be good and helpful! |
23:19 | <littledan> | Whatever works for you |