| 16:23 | <Chengzhong Wu> | I thought web integration was needed to be worked out at stage 2.7 as well. But https://tc39.es/process-document/ mentions that host integration should be investigated at stage 2 |
| 18:40 | <littledan> | well, I thought so too, but IIRC something went to Stage 2.7 last meeting with the idea that host integration is not needed until Stage 3 |
| 18:41 | <littledan> | I'll ask in another channel |
| 18:43 | <Andreu Botella> | I mean, host integration is being investigated |
| 18:44 | <Andreu Botella> | the entrance criteria for 2.7 or 3 doesn't mention host integration, so I'd assume this is something that can continue during those stages? |
| 18:45 | <littledan> | it has definitely been enforced as a requirement for Stage 3 in the past |
| 18:45 | <littledan> | it isn't in the process doc because the relationship between TC39 and the web platform defies consensus |
| 18:56 | <Andreu Botella> | I think we might be overdue for an update anyway, so we could have an "update or stage 2.7" slot |
| 18:57 | <littledan> | I'm not a fan of those ambiguous titles. Stage 2.7 is a huge deal. If we want to ask for it, let's ask for it, not say "or". The committee can say no, and then it's just an update. |
| 18:57 | <littledan> | we are definitely overdue for an update. If we decide not to propose it for 2.7, we should put an update on the agenda |
| 18:58 | <littledan> | in reality the proposal has changed very little since last time, but still, the context has changed, and it's good to keep the energy up around it |