Keep in mind these are written from the perspective of defining a generalized context management system which could exist in many languages, so it doesn't get too deep into JS specifics. It also has some spots I still would like to improve, but what is shared is a snapshot-in-time copy of what the current state is, so I will have to replicate future changes into these docs as it is deemed relevant.

The main change I'm considering is thinking of a better expression of the context management part of the Window Channel concept in Diagnostics Channel to put more of the logic and explanation of its use into the context management space. I'm not yet sure if that involves having some additional ContextWindow construct or something like that...still thinking on that one. 🤔

this is the issue to address that (though the invite list there is likely out-of-date. something to keep in mind, is that it is not a distinct meeting from the private calendar -- it is the same meeting shared across calendars (and this is an important feature)

the meeting is always invite-based by nature -- the question is whether the invite list can be public, with the specific concern being to not release individuals' email addresses publicly without their consent

as long as the meeting notes link can be public, then there is nothing in the meeting description that needs to change, as there is no information that can't be public there

I suggest that that the invite list is made private initially, so that the meeting can be added to the public calendar immediately. the question of the invite list being public has been the blocking issue for other meetings, and they continue to not get added to the public calendar because it goes unresolved. the invite list can be made public later, once everyone has approved (or removed) their email address for/from the invite

if there are no objections, I am going to proceed with this