| 07:53 | <Chengzhong Wu> | I don’t understand a principled way that we should decide which calling contexts to preserve. And the SES folks have made it clear that they see some cases of implicitly propagating the calling contexts to be an unacceptable information leak. But I don’t think losing the calling context in cases like this is a bad enough result to abandon the proposal entirely. |
| 08:01 | <nicolo-ribaudo> | There are multiple SES AsyncContext meetings published at https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzDw4TTug5O1jzKodRDp3qec8zl88oxGd&si=iNtVVedsxGL8PGyb |
| 08:53 | <Chengzhong Wu> | Thanks! The meetings I found in the list are 1 year ago. I thought Dan was saying that there were recent discussions about the proposal |
| 13:33 | <littledan> | it'd be great if someone who is advocating for this sort of change could attend one of the TG3 meetings and discuss their point of view |