| 22:45 | <Danielle Church> | I wonder if Parser Augmentation would make more sense to people if I described it more as "asm.js for the parser" than as "transpilers for the runtime" 🤔 |
| 22:46 | <Danielle Church> | because it's the same kind of concept - ES code that can be executed at runtime without (significant) penalty, but is intended to be statically internalized |
| 23:02 | <Danielle Church> | and it doesn't need TC39 buy-in any more than asm.js did, but the process of writing my own prototype implementation into V8 is reconfirming to me that having expert input on the design from the start will make implementation and integration much easier if and when it does get to runtime engines |