2024-08-21
[05:36:59.0148] <canadahonk>
are there ~docs somewhere on reviving a proposal?

[06:12:26.0020] <ryzokuken>
> <@canadahonk:matrix.org> are there ~docs somewhere on reviving a proposal?

I don't think so but in the past we've had delegates teaming up together to review a proposal to help someone with their first review

[08:04:10.0664] <littledan>
Process-wise, you are allowed to go and revive whatever is abandoned. I think there's a note to this effect in how-we-work or the process doc, but not absolutely sure

[10:21:31.0040] <ljharb>
iirc, in general if the existing champions are no longer around, or are amenable; and if you've done the research to understand its status and its potential hurdles/constraints, then you can just summarily take it over and present it at plenary (usually as like an "update" first, and then advancement at a separate meeting, but that's not a requirement)

[10:24:06.0194] <ryzokuken>
* (nvm, I read that as "reviewing")