20:49 | <sffc> | What is the schedule of meeting and breaks on Tuesday and Wednesday> |
20:49 | <sffc> | ? |
20:49 | <sffc> | In a 4-day, 5-hour setup, we do 2 hrs meeting, 1 hr break, 2 hrs meeting. |
20:49 | <sffc> | How does it work with the 2-day setup? |
20:49 | <Rob Palmer> | Correct. |
20:50 | <sffc> | My calendar has 7 hours blocked for TC39 on Tuesday/Wednesday |
20:50 | <sffc> | Is that incorrect? Should it be only 5 hours? |
20:51 | <sffc> | The TC39 Events Calendar has an event created by yulia which is 7 hours long |
20:52 | <Rob Palmer> | The agenda is correct. The calendar is wrong. |
20:52 | <sffc> | oh, no, I can't read. It's only 5 hours. Maybe yulia fixed it before I copied it from TC39 calendar to my calendar |
20:52 | <sffc> | Sorry! |
20:52 | <Rob Palmer> | No problem - this is useful clarification for all of us 😉 |
20:55 | <sffc> | Are we still planning on the editor updates, or should we skip those given the shorter amount of time? |
20:55 | <sffc> | Maybe we don't need the ECMA-402 update presentation again since we just gave it 6 weeks ago. Also for the ECMA update, etc. |
20:57 | <yulia> | 😬 i have no memory |
20:58 | <Rob Palmer> | Right. I think it's up to each of the groups if they want to present, but I would definitely err on the side of "only if needed" given we only have a total of 8 hours plenary. |
21:01 | <sffc> | OK. I'll let leobalter and Richard Gibson (not on matrix?) decide if they have anything to ask about editorial issues in ECMA-402 |
21:01 | <sffc> | but I won't plan on the normal update presentation. I'll save that for April |
21:02 | <sffc> | yulia: I think the event you created is correct! I don't know how 7 hours ended up on my calendar. Maybe that was a mistake I made. Sorry for the misatribution! |
21:03 | <yulia> | i think your guess was right, i set up the dates before we came up with the 8 meeting schedule, and originally they were 7 hours |
21:03 | <yulia> | so if you pulled in from there, it was the old entry |
21:56 | <littledan> | BTW I want to volunteer my agenda items as lower priority if there's missing time |
21:56 | <littledan> | they are not urgent for any particular reason |
21:56 | <Rob Palmer> | Thank you, Dan |
21:56 | <littledan> | I like the idea of doing the regular status updates only at the longer meetings |
21:57 | <littledan> | (of course if there is some normative PR that Intl wants to propose, that's fine to include; no reason that that needs to be batched only 4 times a year) |
23:24 | <mpcsh> | oh, no, I can't read. It's only 5 hours. Maybe yulia fixed it before I copied it from TC39 calendar to my calendar |