00:01
<shu>
yes, it would be good to call out all the entry points
00:02
<shu>
lack of tighter integration of entry points is what led to our having a "dead" (i.e. no upstream specs were using it) Jobs machinery for so long
00:38
<rbuckton>
FYI: I'm looking for feedback on a proposed changed to the explicit resource management proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management/issues/65. The feedback from that issue will help me prepare for bringing this proposal back to committee at an upcoming meeting. Any input would be appreciated.
01:13
<mhofman>
presumably we could just pick one, but i'm guessing the challenge is ensuring that the one we pick matches the intention of people relying on those meanings?
Since the current meaning is both, why can't we keep isExtensible as-is, add new isMutablePrototype and preventPrototypeMutation traps, and add an invariant that [[IsMutablePrototype]] must return false if [[IsExtensible]] returns false? Then since the proxy exotic functions currently enforces the invariants on the target, the proxy traps would have to respect the invariants. Is there something I'm missing?
01:37
<ljharb>
that kind of matches what i'd assume we'd do
06:06
<Ashley Claymore>
FYI: I'm looking for feedback on a proposed changed to the explicit resource management proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management/issues/65. The feedback from that issue will help me prepare for bringing this proposal back to committee at an upcoming meeting. Any input would be appreciated.

Branch name:

there-is-no-try

Very much enjoyed that

14:36
<TabAtkins (OOO Sep18-Sep26)>
@bakkot return a string for "yes" and the new case, so it's still truthy for the cases that are at least somewhat extensible?
17:17
<Ashley Claymore>
Reminder: Record & Tuple Monthly today at 18:00 UTC (in 45mins)
18:03
<mhofman>
Reminder: Record & Tuple Monthly today at 18:00 UTC (in 45mins)
Is the meeting on?
18:04
<nicolo-ribaudo>
We have some problems with starting the call
18:05
<nicolo-ribaudo>
Ok it's working