| 01:31 | <jschoi> | FYI: If you were one of the several people to whom a person (who has been temporarily banned from the pipe-operator repository by the CoC committee) has sent a personal email about their dev.to article: I’ve forwarded the email to the CoC committee. Please don’t reply to the email. |
| 01:32 | <TabAtkins (OOO Sep18-Sep26)> | Danke, I was making dinner when it came in but I was going to do the same. |
| 10:55 | <ryzokuken> | Is there a good place to discuss the ECMA by-laws and rules? Not sure if this room can be used for that. |
| 12:30 | <ryzokuken> | Since it is a non-technical discussion, I went ahead and created a private room to discuss the by-laws, rules and different terms of the upcoming partnership. Please let me know if you need an invite. |
| 17:45 | <mpcsh> | We should have that as written guidance with instructions for how to set up a channel correctly, in how-we-work or something |
| 17:46 | <TabAtkins (OOO Sep18-Sep26)> | Since I had no idea that I should be looking in that repo for anything like this, yes, it would be great to have that in how-we-work. ^_^ Looks good at a quick glance. |
| 17:47 | <mpcsh> | yeah, I don't really know why I put it in the inclusion group repo 😅 |
| 17:55 | <mpcsh> | https://github.com/tc39/how-we-work/pull/98 |